Who hasn’t dreamt of being at the summit by sunrise? Just 100 more meters to go. How do we picture the moment of arrival? First, stretch out on the alpine meadow, soak in the view. And then? Coffee! But not just any coffee—one that truly lives up to its name and makes us happy. Back home, we’ve got our fancy espresso machine, so we’re definitely not Team Nescafé. Even up here, we want the finest coffee experience and that cozy hygge moment. Because great taste knows no limits.

At the same time, space on our bikes or in our hiking backpacks is limited, and we don’t want to lug around too much gear. So, what does it take to brew the perfect summit coffee? The best portable coffee maker? The finest beans? Or maybe the perfect grinder? We’ll show you what we packed for bikepacking in the Dolomites.

You can find the full test at our sister magazine DOWNTOWN.

Der Beitrag The perfect summit coffee for bikepacking and hiking tours erschien zuerst auf E-MOUNTAINBIKE Magazine.

The debate about battery capacities has been a heated one since day one in the eMTB segment, and still remains one of the biggest selling points for bike manufacturers – as our annual reader survey also confirmed. This makes it all the more important for manufacturers to stay competitive and keep up with current developments. Initially, batteries were mostly mounted externally; today, they’re integrated into the frame and often removable. Nearly all e-bike systems also offer the option of adding an external range extender. Moreover, there has never been such a wide variety of different battery capacities as there is now. As e-bike rider types are becoming more diverse, manufacturers are trying to keep up and cater to the varying needs of different customer groups. Needless to say, bike realised that different different bike- and rider-types require different battery capacities. In other words, consumers are no longer limited to a single battery size, which was the case for a long time due to a lack of options – today, you can get many bike models with different battery options. Pretty cool!

In addition, battery capacities have grown significantly over the years to keep pace with increasingly powerful motors. The common enemy: range anxiety. At the same time, cell technology has improved, allowing engineers to squeeze more battery capacity into the same pack size. This is particularly important for eMTBs, where handling and design are crucial criteria. As a result, pack size, battery shape, and energy density are critical factors – and this is precisely where the problem lies.

Trying to take a critical look at manufacturers’ battery capacity specifications – typically given in watt-hours (Wh) – might bring back memories of your last contract with an internet provider. Most people are aware that the advertised network speeds are rarely achieved, as they are conveniently labeled with an “up to” disclaimer. With e-bike batteries, however, this isn’t the case, even though the underlying concept is quite similar.

The problem: Since there are no specific regulations on how manufacturers have to calculate battery capacity, significant differences can arise between brands – even when the actual capacity is the same. Tolerance ranges are pushed to the limit, standardised lab measurements are recontextualised because they supposedly don’t reflect real-world eMTB scenarios. As a result, varying definitions of how much capacity is truly available to power the motor result in confusing figures. When combined with technical factors such as cell quality, the topic becomes so complex that even experts often struggle to keep up. Some manufacturers take advantage of this complexity. While the figures frequently presented as marketing claims aren’t outright lies, they don’t fully reflect reality – and manufacturers are well aware of this.

Warning, things are about to get technical: In this article, we’ll focus on calculating a battery’s nominal capacity. Nominal capacity can be determined from standardised measured values that every manufacturer is required to provide. This allows not only users but also manufacturers to make fair comparisons. As a result, many bike brands are calling for nominal capacity to become the new standard for specifying battery capacities. While many manufacturers already follow this practice, others still take advantage of buyers’ lack of knowledge by inflating their marketed battery capacity with undefined claims.

How do you work out the nominal capacity of an e-bike battery?

Calculating a battery’s nominal capacity isn’t rocket science, and anyone can work it out in no time. Every battery manufacturer is required to provide the necessary data directly on the battery itself. All batteries have a nameplate displaying various technical specifications. Additionally, manufacturers often include a battery data sheet on their websites, or in some cases, the information is displayed directly on the website, as is the case with Bosch.

Motor manufacturers like Bosch, SRAM, Fazua, TQ, and DJI rely on a closed system, meaning that anyone using their motors must pair them with their batteries. As a result, bike brands have little to no influence over the advertised battery capacity. It’s a different story with motor systems from manufacturers like Shimano and Brose, which allow bike brands to pair their drives with third-party batteries, for example from companies like Chinese manufacturer Trendpower or Taiwanese supplier Darfon. This allows them to influence not only the cell types, cell arrangement, and the matching housing but also the specified battery capacity. Popular examples include Orbea, Canyon, MERIDA, and Specialized, all of which have bikes in their portfolios with custom batteries.

To calculate the nominal battery capacity, you need two values: The first one is the battery’s rated capacity, which is measured in Ampere-hours (Ah). The rated capacity cannot technically be manipulated, as battery manufacturers are required to specify this value according to the IEC61960 standard. It is measured in a standardised laboratory process and reflects the minimum capacity of a cell based on the Gaussian normal distribution. In a nutshell, after determining the average value from the lab measurements, you subtract the tolerance value to find out the minimum guaranteed cell capacity. The only issue – and the reason why manufacturers “technically” can’t cheat – lies in the certification requirements for different markets. In South Korea, for example, certification requires the “rated capacity” to reflect the minimum capacity value. Other markets would accept the actual average value. However, since nearly every cell and battery manufacturer includes the Korean market in their sales strategy, the rated capacity listed on the nameplate always represents the minimum capacity value. This still leaves room for cheeky manufacturers to interpret the numbers differently.

The second value needed is the system voltage, which is measured in volts (V). Most motor systems currently available on the market, like the Bosch CX Gen4 and Gen5, the Shimano EP801, SRAM Powertrain, and Brose Drive S Mag – which is specced on the latest Specialized Levo model, for example – use a 36V voltage system. In contrast, the TQ HPR 50 system operates at 50.4V, the Fazua Ride60 system at 43.2V, and the Specialized SL 1.2 at 46.8V.

All this information can also be found on the battery’s nameplate. To determine the nominal battery capacity, simply multiply the nominal capacity by the system voltage. To prevent you from having to search the internet or run straight to your garage, we’ve done the research for you and compiled a list of all relevant, exciting, and widely-used battery options.

How bad is the battery confusion really?

This is a question everyone must answer for themselves, as it depends on how much importance you place on actual capacity and how often you fully drain your battery. In most cases, the differences in battery capacity amount to only a few percent. However, depending on the battery size, these deviations can quickly exceed 30 Wh, which could be crucial in determining whether you make it home on a long ride. Additionally, different batteries may have the same nominal capacity but are marketed differently by manufacturers. If you’re sitting on the fence between two such bikes, this factor might wrongly influence your purchase decision.

Manufacturers are well aware of this issue and closely analyse their competitors’ specifications. To remain competitive, they often feel compelled to adjust or even enhance their own capacity figures. Each manufacturer must decide whether to play this game to survive in the tough current market. This is one reason why many manufacturers are frustrated by inconsistent capacity claims. A noteworthy example is Bosch, which has taken the lead by specifying the nominal capacity of their new batteries – 600 Wh and 800 Wh – which wasn’t the case with their older models. Bike manufacturers like MERIDA have also indicated that they plan to align more closely with nominal capacity standards in the future.

Of course, nominal battery capacity is just one piece of the puzzle, and many other factors influence the “usable capacity” of a battery pack. One crucial factor is the quality of the cells – a detail that’s often hard for customers to evaluate or even understand. Two battery packs may have the same nominal capacity but use different-quality cells. High-quality cells have a higher maximum discharge depth, meaning that they provide more usable capacity to power the motor. In contrast, cheaper cells may not support deep discharges and require a higher remaining voltage, meaning less usable capacity and a smaller range. Additionally, manufacturers differ in how much capacity they reserve for functions like lights, displays, and electronic shifting. This also affects the amount of energy available for propulsion.

What do manufacturers say about the battery confusion?

Needless to say, we asked all the manufacturers listed in the table above for a statement. Not all of them reached out for a comment, but we’ll update the article should we receive additional responses.

Our claimed capacity is sometimes higher than the nominal capacity because the rated capacity is measured under standardised test conditions, which often differ from real-world usage. For our claimed capacity, we follow the capacity specifications provided by cell manufacturers: for example, our 600Wh battery contains 30 cells, each with a Watt-hour rating of 20 Wh. Deviations from the nominal capacity mainly result from tests conducted under worst-case conditions, commonly used for determining the rated capacity. Ensuring that the measured nominal capacity aligns with the claimed capacity is a central priority for us. Transparent and reliable specifications are crucial for building customer trust. Therefore, we work closely with our battery partners to meet these standards together. Our new Bosch PT600 and PT800 batteries already comply with this approach. Likewise, our new Shimano batteries for MY26 will have a nominal capacity that exactly matches the claimed capacity. Benjamin Diemer – CEO MERIDA R&D

As one of the world’s leading technology companies, DJI is committed to providing best-in-class innovation and the DJI Avinox Drive System is no exception. When it comes to batteries, actual battery capacity depends on several factors such as the real use scenarios of the battery and also the temperature. To define a battery’s core capacity, the charging voltage, current and temperature need to be taken into consideration. A new battery is typically charged to 4.2V using a 0.2C current at 25°C, followed by discharging to 2.5V. For the Avinox Drive System’s LG M58T battery, the standard battery core capacity is 20.28Wh, with a minimum capacity of 20.0Wh. We calculate the actual pack capacity, based on a 3% remaining power calculation, is 786.86Wh, which represents 98.36% of its nominal 800Wh rating. However, in real-world applications, discharge currents are typically higher than the 0.2C rate, which can result in a reduced maximum discharge capacity—often falling below 800Wh, and in some cases as low as 750Wh, depending on the discharge current. Additionally, temperature plays a significant role in discharge capacity, with lower temperatures further impacting the ability to reach nominal capacity. This variance between nominal and actual capacity, explained above, is common in battery metrics. To present more favorable performance metrics, some manufacturers may use the standard capacity as their declared value. For most applications, the LG M58T battery is rated at 800Wh, delivering reliable performance with these considerations in mind. Ferdinand Wolf – Product Experience Director DJI

Our goal is to provide maximum transparent and practical information for users. The label on Bosch eBike batteries typically includes three values. The rated capacity, specified in ampere-hours (Ah), corresponds to the minimum value defined by the IEC61960 standard that the battery must achieve. The battery voltage, specified in volts (V), remains largely constant. The energy content, specified in watt-hours (Wh), represents the typical nominal value and indicates the capacity the battery delivers in typical use. According to the IEC61960 standard, cell manufacturers are required to specify the minimum capacity (Ah) of their cells. Despite consistent quality and performance, this value can vary slightly between cells from different manufacturers. The minimum value is used to calculate the nominal capacity at the battery level. In practice, however, the energy specification in Wh is usually slightly higher than the calculated result based on rated capacity (Ah) and battery voltage (V). For this reason, the specifications on the batteries may differ slightly. Dr. Vikram Godbole – Senior Produktmanager Bosch eBike Systems

Cell capacity (Ah) is determined under laboratory conditions following specific test procedures. Two different capacities are calculated based on different test conditions: the rated capacity (Ah) and the typical capacity (Ah), with the latter always being slightly higher. The battery pack capacity (Ah) value is obtained by multiplying the cell capacity by the pack configuration (the number of parallel branches). For all future SBC battery models, rated and typical capacity, as well as the corresponding energy in Wh (capacity multiplied by the nominal voltage), will be written on the battery label for maximum transparency. More attentive riders may realize that these values are not obtained when discharging the battery to 0%, according to the display. This is because a small portion of the capacity is reserved. This reserved capacity ensures the optimal function of the battery management system (BMS) under all circumstances. Furthermore, it allows an uncompromised riding experience right up until 0% and then keeps the lights operational for an additional 2 hours to keep you safe at night – even when the battery is displaying empty. SBC is always optimizing this reserved capacity to deliver the biggest amount of power for rider (motor) support while ensuring the safe and smooth operation of the system. Simon Maksay – Battery Engineer Specialized Bicycle Components

5.8Ah is the maximum rated capacity for each cell. We have chosen to use the maximum capacity measurement to determine the capacity of each battery because we feel it is a constant measure. Our goal is to stick to one style of measurement so consumers are able to compare generations of our bikes to one another. Another important measure is the available charge, i.e. how much the motor can use. We spend a lot of time working in our laboratory on this number and with Rise we have been able to create a control software that is able to safely use much more of the available charge, meaning a much longer range. On the new generation of batteries, the cells we are using are 21700 5.8Ah cells, which means that every cell provides 5.8Ah of capacity. Depending on the battery we have a different amount of 10 cells packs. The 630Wh main battery for example has 3 packs, the 420Wh main battery 2 pack, and the 210Wh range extender 1 pack. To know the real capacity, we multiply the battery tension (36V) by the number of cell packs (3, 2, or 1) and by the cell capacity (5.8Ah). This way we know the real capacity of the battery. Markel Uriarte – Global MTB Product Manager ORBEA

Conclusions about actual battery capacities

There are many reasonable explanations for how battery capacity is determined for marketing purposes. However, as long as so many different approaches are used, comparing battery capacities directly is unfair and, quite frankly, pointless. Therefore, we need a firmly established and transparent method that all relevant battery manufacturers follow. The method of calculating nominal capacity appears to be the most practical solution at this stage. The efforts of many manufacturers to implement and use it as a reference value already show that it’s gradually becoming an industry standard.

In our future tests, we will also mention these specifications to help promote this standard. If you want to learn more about e-bike motor systems and related terminology, be sure to check out our detailed e-bike motor comparison test.

Der Beitrag Is the battery arms race in the eMTB sector fair? erschien zuerst auf E-MOUNTAINBIKE Magazine.

If you brave the elements with your bike in the cold season, protecting your hands is essential. However, the market for winter gloves is overwhelming, and trying out different models before buying isn’t always an option. That’s why we’ve taken a closer look at a selection of manufacturers and compared thick, medium, and thin winter gloves specifically designed for e-mountain bikers.

What really matters with winter cycling gloves?

Let’s get one thing clear straight away: forget about the perfect all-around winter glove. As with many things, it’s about finding the best compromise between sometimes conflicting features to meet your specific needs. To ensure this search doesn’t end in frustration, we’ve put together a few tips to help you choose the right cycling gloves for the cold season.

Size recommendations in detail: Why fit is crucial
Manufacturers’ online sizing guides can be frustrating, as they often only consider finger length or hand circumference. This can lead to recommendations that differ by up to two sizes from reality, as experienced by our testers. A standout example is SQlab, which offers a printable template that accounts for both measurements and provides Slim and Wide options for their winter gloves, ensuring a more accurate fit.
Our tip: When in doubt, choose winter gloves one size bigger rather than too small.

As thin as possible, as thick as necessary
It’s crystal-clear: more isn’t always better! Choosing the thickest winter cycling gloves available on the market doesn’t necessarily mean making the best choice. Gloves that are too thick or warm for the intended use can result in sweaty hands, reducing control over the bike – and ultimately compromising both safety and riding fun.

Cruising vs. shredding hard
The ideal winter glove depends on your riding style: Are you looking for warm, dry hands on your commute to work or maximum grip and control on your home trails? Whether you ride with or without motor assistance plays a crucial role too. In our test, the subjective comfort zone of a glove shifted by about 5 to 10°C lower when riding without motor support. While thin winter gloves provided enough insulation for trail rides without assistance with temperatures just below freezing, e-bike commutes required the thickest gloves to stay comfortable during rides with moderate cardio-activity and fast-paced shredding.

Control vs. Insulation
It comes as no surprise that thinner gloves usually ensure better grip and a higher level of sensitivity, while thicker gloves are warmer. However, our tests revealed notable differences: not all thin winter gloves deliver the same level of control, and some thicker gloves even offer better grip than much thinner ones. Additionally, there’s a wide range of insulation performance among the thinner gloves. This means that even if you know your intended use, it’s worth taking a closer look at the individual models.

Mitten concepts are warmer
We all learned as kids: nothing keeps fingers warmer than mittens while sledding! But when you’re in a snowball fight, they fail spectacularly! For winter cycling gloves, manufacturers opt for hybrid models known as trigger gloves. These combine the warmth of mittens with a degree of dexterity: the pinkie, middle and ring finger are in one section, while the thumb and index finger are in a separate one.

Our take: The concept works well for winter cycling gloves overall, though this doesn’t mean that trigger gloves are always the best choice, especially for shaping snowballs!

How we tested the winter cycling gloves

To find the best winter cycling gloves, we tested all models over several weeks throughout autumn and winter in a variety of meteorological conditions. The focus was on e-bike rides with moderate effort, such as office commutes, trips to the bakery, and rides to the cinema. However, the gloves also had to prove their capabilities on sporty weekend tours and the occasional trail adventure. For additional insights, our colleagues from sister magazines ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine, GRAN FONDO, and DOWNTOWN joined the testing, contributing their experiences. A particularly revealing method was wearing different gloves on the right and left hands, which is a simple way to compare different glove models directly.

The Tops and Flops from our Winter Gloves Group Test

Tops

Flops

The Winter Gloves in Review

Roeckl Sports | VILLACH 2

The Roeckl Sports VILLACH 2 is a thick, well-crafted winter cycling glove that keeps your fingers comfortably warm even in sub-zero temperatures. However, the insulation falls slightly short compared to the two other thick trigger models in this test, the Gore-Tex-insulated Trigger glove and the KinetiXx Luzan. On the upside, it enables better finger mobility, providing some riders with a greater sense of control and safety than the trigger models.
Another advantage is the stability of the glove’s insulation layers, which don’t shift when gripping, thus ensuring a firm hold on bigger objects. However, handling smaller items, like zippers, is more challenging. Crucially, the Roeckl Sports VILLACH 2 ensures excellent contact with the cockpit, with the grippy material on the palm enabling top grip without slipping, while the test’s thickest palm padding provides a higher degree of comfort – albeit at the cost of a slightly muted riding feel.
The VILLACH gloves excel in wearing comfort thanks to their soft inner material, though the sharp-edged label on the inner wrist should be removed before wearing. The elastic wristband is a bit too loose, and the glove’s touchscreen functionality is limited too, requiring extra effort during rides. Reflective elements enhance visibility in poor lighting conditions.

Conclusions: The Roeckl Sports VILLACH gloves are a solid choice for comfort and insulation, with minor shortcomings in dexterity and adjustability.

Sizes: 6–12
Weight: 148 g (size 11,5)
Features: GORE-TEX Windstopper on the back of the hand, long knitted cuff, wiping thumb, reflectors

Preis: €69.95
Manufacturer’s Website

GORE | GORE-TEX insulated Trigger gloves

The GORE-TEX Insulated Trigger Gloves impressed on all our test rides with their exceptional warmth. Even in extremely low temperatures, our fingers remained comfortably warm – matching the KinetiXx Luzan as the top performers in heat retention among the trigger models in this test. The trigger design strikes a good balance between warmth and mobility, allowing smooth operation of handlebars and cockpit controls.
However, dexterity for handling smaller objects is significantly limited, and touchscreen functionality is virtually nonexistent. The overall sense of control is somewhat reduced due to the insulation layers not being firmly connected, causing slight movement when gripping. That said, the gloves offer excellent wearing comfort thanks to their soft inner material and scratch-free wrist fit.

Conclusions: The GORE-TEX Insulated Trigger Gloves are the ideal choice for those who prioritize maximum comfort and warmth over control and dexterity, which makes them perfect for the harshest weather conditions.

Sizes: 5 (XS)–11 (XXXL)
Weight: 125 g (Größe 9)
Features: waterproof GORE-TEX membrane, touchscreen fingers
Price: €99,95
Manufacturer’s Website

KinetiXx | Warm Trigger Winter Cycling Gloves Luzan

The KinetiXx Luzan Trigger Winter Gloves are thick winter cycling gloves that can get too warm when active at temperatures just above freezing but are perfectly comfortable on an e-bike. Alongside the GORE-TEX Insulated Trigger Gloves, they are the warmest option in this test. The trigger design preserves good mobility for the thumb and index finger, enabling seamless shifting, braking, and gripping of the handlebars.
The Luzan Trigger provides a very comfortable fit with no pressure points or manufacturing flaws. The wrist strap holds securely, though the adjustable elastic band is slightly loose and contributes little to the overall fit. The palm padding strikes the best balance between comfort and control in this test and features effective anti-slip strips. An absorbent material on the thumb’s back allows you to wipe sweat off your face.
Smartphone operation is challenging, and the gloves offer limited dexterity. However, the secure grip and added reflectors enhance safety and visibility in poorlighting conditions.

Conclusions: Thanks to the exceptional insulation, the KinetiXx Luzan delivers the most convincing all-around performance in this test, proving the top choice for very cold conditions.

Sizes: 6,5–11
Weight: 158 g (size 11)
Features:: Windstopper on the back of the hand, wiping thumb, reflectors
Price: €79,99
Manufacturer’s Website

Canyon | Cycling Gloves Winter

The Canyon Winter Gloves fall into the “medium-thick” category in this test, which makes them suitable for e-bike rides at temperatures as low as 5°C. Subtly designed, they feature a simple look that might appeal to city commuters looking for a more casual, everyday-style rather than sporty gear.
The winter cycling gloves are exceptionally wide in the finger and palm areas, which increases mobility but significantly limits dexterity. For individuals with wider fingers, they might be one of the few practical five-finger options in this test field. However, the narrow, non-adjustable elastic wristband could pose an issue for those with wider wrists.
Another drawback is the loose connection between the inner and outer material layers, which makes it harder to put on and take off the glove while further reducing dexterity. Needless to say, this defeats the purpose of the grippy palm material. Additionally, smartphone operation is virtually impossible with these gloves.

Conclusions: The Canyon Winter Gloves seem underdeveloped overall and are best suited for the city, though even here, the lack of touchscreen functionality is a big limitation.

Sizes: XS–2XL
Weight: 148 g (size XL)
Features:: PrimaLoft Gold insulation (also water-repellent), waterproof membrane on the palm, wiping thumb
Price: €69,95
Manufacturer’s Website

Endura | MT500 Freezing Point

The Endura MT500 Freezing Point gloves are medium-thick winter cycling gloves suitable for e-bike rides at temperatures down to around 5°C, which places them in the same comfort range as the Canyon Winter Gloves. However, the Endura gloves perform better under exertion, keeping your fingers warm thanks to the superior sweat and heat dissipation.
Although there’s some movement between the inner and outer material layers, this is significantly less pronounced than in the Canyon Winter Gloves and GORE Insulated Trigger Gloves. Finger mobility and dexterity are good for medium-thick gloves, making it easier to handle zippers and backpack clips compared to the thicker gloves in this test field. However, they are not as user-friendly as the GORE Zone Thermo Gloves or SQlab SQ-Gloves ONE10, which excel in this regard.
The wrist velcro closure could do with some improvement, as the soft material often folds over and obstructs the mechanism. Additionally, the latex-like grip coating on the palm surprisingly proves slippery on some common MTB grips. A standout feature is the above-average touchscreen compatibility, which makes it easier to operate a smartphone compared to most models in this test.

Conclusions: The Endura MT500 Freezing Point gloves offer solid winter performance and excellent tactile properties, though their effectiveness is somewhat diminished by the occasionally slippery palm coating.

Sizes: XS–XXL
Weight: 123 g (size XL)
Features: PrimaLoft Gold insulation (also water-repellent), touchscreen fingers, wiping thumb
Price: €79,99
Manufacturer’s Website

SQlab | SQ-Gloves ONE10

The SQlab SQ-Gloves ONE10 are lightweight winter cycling gloves with outstanding versatility. They are compatible with an optional wind/rain cover, which can be neatly tucked away in a pocket at the back of the hand when not in use. These gloves provide effective insulation with temperatures between 0 and 10°C, with the cover significantly boosting warmth, making the SQ-Gloves ONE10 the model with the broadest temperature range in this test.
The thin neoprene material on the back of the hand ensures excellent finger mobility, which makes it easy to handle zippers and helmet buckles. In terms of grip and dexterity, they rank among the top performers in this test, just slightly behind the GORE Zone Thermo Gloves, with the ION Gloves Shelter Explore trailing. However, the inward-facing seams at the fingertips may press on the finger pads if the gloves are too tight. With the right fit, however, comfort is outstanding.
Speaking of fit, the SQ-Gloves ONE10 are the only gloves in this test that are available in both slim and wide versions, paired with the most accurate size recommendations amongst all models. The functional Velcro closure provides a secure fit, and the faux-suede palm offers excellent grip. The only drawback is the underwhelming touchscreen compatibility of the thumb and index finger coating.

Conclusions: The SQlab SQ-Gloves ONE10 offers the broadest temperature comfort range, a perfect fit with the best size guidance in this test, and a choice between two different cuts.

Sizes: XS–XL (available in slim and wide fit))
Weight: 86 g (size XL, slim)
Ausstattung: waterproof palm, additional rain cover for rain/cold, touchscreen-compatible fingers
Price: €69,95
Manufacturer’s Website

ION | Gloves Shelter Explore Unisex

The ION Shelter Explore Unisex are lightweight, thin winter cycling gloves that offer excellent finger mobility. However, they are less suited for extreme cold. Moisture management is a major drawback, because the palms tend to stay noticeably damp during intense activity compared to the other thin gloves in this test, like the GORE Zone Thermo Gloves and SQlab SQ-Gloves ONE10.
Like the latter two, the ION Shelter Explore gloves are highly packable, which makes it easy to stow them away in a backpack, in a bike’s storage compartment, or simply in your jacket when the weather warms up. The breathable material ensures a comfortable inner climate, but the overall fit is slightly looser than with other thin gloves, which compromises grip and precision slightly. A standout feature is the excellent touchscreen compatibility, the best in this test, complemented by a well-designed wiping thumb.

Conclusions: The ION Shelter Explore Unisex gloves are lightweight and highly packable winter gloves with exceptional finger mobility and outstanding touchscreen compatibility. However, they are less ideal for extreme cold and intense sweating.

Size: XS–XL
Weight: 55 g (size XL)
Features: windproof and water-repellent backhand, wiping thumb, touchscreen-compatible fingers
Price: €69,99
Manufacturer’s Website

GORE | Zone Thermo Gloves

The GORE Zone Thermo Gloves are lightweight, thin winter cycling gloves that excel in temperatures between 10 and 5°C. For colder conditions on an e-bike, the insulation might not be sufficient for many riders. However, moisture management is the best in this test: the hands stay dry even during intense activity, while the inner lining dries remarkably fast.
These gloves ensure excellent finger mobility and reliable dexterity, making tasks like tying shoelaces easy. Touchscreen compatibility is also among the best in this test. However, they are relatively short and lack a full closure, leading to a less snug fit around the wrist and reduced insulation in this area. A practical feature is the absorbent material on the back of the thumbs, useful for wiping sweat off the face.
Conclusions: The GORE Zone Thermo Gloves stand out with the best price, outstanding moisture management, and top-notch dexterity in the entire test field. However, the limited insulation makes them ideal winter gloves for sporty rides rather than extreme cold.

Conclusions: The GORE Zone Thermo Gloves stand out with the best price, outstanding moisture management, and top-notch dexterity in the entire test field. However, the limited insulation makes them ideal winter gloves for sporty rides rather than extreme cold.

Sizes: XS–XXXL
Weight: 52 g (size XXL, 10)
Features: wind- and water-resistant thermal fabric, touchscreen-compatible fingers, wiping thumb
Price: €49,95
Manufacturer’s Website

Conclusions: Which Winter Cycling Gloves Would We Recommend?

As we’ve emphasized repeatedly, the best winter cycling glove is the one that best suits the intended use, which makes it a highly subjective choice. However, a few models stood out in this test, allowing us to make three clear recommendations:

For the Coldest Days:
The KinetiXx Luzan impressed us the most. As one of the warmest gloves in this test, it combines excellent craftsmanship with surprisingly good control.

The Best Balance Between Insulation and Control:
The SQlab SQ-Gloves ONE10 M deliver a well-rounded package. The wide temperature range, outstanding sizing guidance, and variety of fits make them a versatile choice.

For Highly Active Riders:
If you don’t need thick gloves, the GORE Zone Thermo Gloves are a clear favourite, even when riding e-bikes. They fit like a second skin and are perfect for active riders with good circulation.

Der Beitrag Winter Cycling Gloves Comparison Test – 8 Winter-glove models for different needs erschien zuerst auf E-MOUNTAINBIKE Magazine.

First off, a massive thank you to all of you! You’re incredible – 14,779 of our readers took the time to answer up to 50 questions. And as if that wasn’t impressive enough, many of you wrote entire essays in the open text fields! That’s anything but obvious, especially with an average completion time of nearly 20 minutes. Hats off to all of you! So, grazie mille, muchas gracias, tack, merci beaucoup, どうも, dzięki, obrigado, спасибо, hvala, teşekkürler, 谢谢你, شكرا, děkuji, hartelijk bedankt, thanks a lot – and, of course, thank you very much!

What will happen to your answers? It’s simple: you’re our polar star! Your feedback actively helps shape the planning of our future reports and stories, allowing us to cover the topics that matter most to you. Your responses are also invaluable for our group tests, where space for bikes and components is limited. In short, you’ll have a huge influence on how we work.

Now it gets really exciting! Below, we’ll reveal which brands you see at the top in 2025 – whether it’s the makers of the best road bike products or the ones on your wishlist for your next purchase.

The best eMTB brand of 2024

The best eMTB brands of 2024 in detail

How are the results determined? It’s simple: in our reader survey, we asked which brand you think builds the best bikes and which one tops your shopping list. As a global magazine, we took the opportunity to analyse the feedback from our German-speaking and international readers separately – and uncovered some truly fascinating differences along the way.

Your next eMTB

Best brand of 2024: Parts and accessories

A great bike is more than just the sum of its parts – that much is clear. But even the best bike is only as strong as its weakest link. So, which brands deliver the absolute best products? Just like with complete bikes, we’ve also analysed the votes for components and accessories separately from our German-speaking and international readers. The result? Some categories show fascinating consensus, while others reveal clear differences between markets. The “Best Brand” title went to the brands that garnered the most votes overall – regardless of the language and region. Want the details? Take a look for yourself!

The lucky winner

One of the reasons we love our reader survey so much? Not only does it help us get to know you better but also gives us the chance to surprise you with fantastic prizes! Together with our giveaway partner ROSE, we raffled off a Trance X Advanced E+ Elite 0 | V2 worth € 10,499 among all participants. Our lucky winner Janine has been notified.

Those were the Best Brands 2024! Don’t feel represented here? Then sign up for our Newsletter to make sure you don’t miss the next reader survey!

Der Beitrag What are the best eMTB brands of 2024? erschien zuerst auf E-MOUNTAINBIKE Magazine.

After a rainy trail session, you often ask yourself: when and how should you clean your bike? Ideally, before the mud gets a chance to turn into a stubborn dry crust on the frame. This is precisely where the Muc-Off mobile pressure washer comes into play: equipped with a 40V lithium-ion battery, a 500-watt motor, and a 20-liter water tank, this pressure washer promises a quick and thorough clean – either in the car park after a ride or outside your house if if you don’t have a garden with a hose pipe.

The pressure washer comes standard with four nozzles, each designed for different applications. A standout feature is the “Snow Foamer,” which, in combination with Muc-Off’s bike cleaner, produces a thick snow-like foam – whether you need this is up to you. Additionally, there is a nozzle specifically for bicycles (gentle), one for motorcycles (powerful), and an adjustable nozzle for particularly stubborn dirt (intense).

Assembling and disassembling the Muc-Off mobile pressure washer

The mobile pressure washer is designed to be intuitive and straightforward to use: simply insert the battery, fill the tank from the top, connect the hose to a nozzle and the unit using the click mechanism, and press the power button – one of the two buttons on the device. Switching to another nozzle can be a bit tricky at first but becomes easier with practice.

Switching from Eco to Boost mode is done via the second button on the back of the device. When dismantling, the connections between the hose and the nozzle or device need to be disengaged using a sliding mechanism. This works smoothly, though a bit of residual water might remain in the system; tilting the device briefly helps to drain it completely.

The Muc-Off mobile pressure washer in practice

For an extensive test, we took the Muc-Off Mobile Pressure Washer along on a major shoot in cold, wet weather. Initially, we tried to increase battery life by using the Eco mode but soon opted for more power. The Boost mode, in contrast, was quite impressive – a single charge in this mode is enough to clean up to seven muddy bikes.

A similar experience applied to the choice of nozzle: while the bike nozzle is certainly gentle on bearings and sensitive eMTB electronics, it’s also gentle on the dirt. The motorcycle nozzle, on the other hand, takes on the job with satisfying vigor. The combination of the motorcycle nozzle and Boost mode is particularly enjoyable– though you’ll have to be careful in sensitive areas of the bike.

The 20-liter water tank is sufficient for cleaning two very dirty bikes, making it practical for use in a parking lot after a ride or in front of a city apartment without access to a garden hose. Naturally, the main limitation of the mobile pressure washer is water supply: Muc-Off offers an additional water tank for transport in a car, as the pressure washer itself isn’t suitable for that purpose. At home, the tank can be filled from a tap or in the bathtub, although this means that you’ll have to carry the unit to the place where you’re washing the bike – on flat, smoother surfaces you can roll it on the sturdy wheels by pulling the handle.

Conclusions about the Muc-Off mobile pressure washer

While not every accessory managed to impress us, the Muc-Off mobile pressure washer performs its core task brilliantly. For a battery-powered pressure washer, the cleaning power is remarkable, especially with the right nozzle and in Boost mode. Both the battery life and the available water volume are suitable for the intended scenarios mentioned above. So, if you’re in the market for a battery-powered pressure washer for your bike, the Muc-Off’s mobile pressure washer is definitely worth considering.

Tops

• Mobile concept
• Easy assembly and disassembly
• Excellent cleaning performance
• Good battery life and water capacity

Flops

• Eco mode is too weak
• Accessories only partially useful

For more information visit mucoff.com

Der Beitrag Muc-Off mobile pressure washer on test – Bye bye dirt! erschien zuerst auf E-MOUNTAINBIKE Magazine.

SCOTT Sports are far more than just a bike manufacturer. The company, with its roots in the USA and headquarters in Switzerland, also produces equipment for winter sports, motorsports, and running. The new Patron eRide was developed on this side of the pond, and that showcases what modern e-bikes are capable of. The new Patron relies on an entirely new look and comes equipped with the brand-new Bosch Performance Line CX Gen 5 motor, with two travel options to choose from. Everything about the bike is streamlined and minimalist: the shock, motor, and battery are fully integrated into the frame, along with a permanent rear light for better visibility. As a result, the new Patron looks as if it were cast from a single mould. Two spec variants, including our test bike, feature Bosch’s eBike ABS Pro system, which brings an innovative safety system to the trails. With a price tag of € 10,999 and a weight of 24.3 kilograms, the question remains: does all this technology and integration truly enhance the riding experience?

The new 2025 SCOTT Patron eRide in detail

As you can read in our review of the previous model, the SCOTT Patron was already a wonder of integration back in 2022. Back then, the shock was hidden under a plastic cover in the beefy top tube, while the Bosch Performance Line CX Gen 4 motor sat prominently in the frame triangle – encased in plastic but not fully integrated into the frame. With the latest model, the Swiss developers took integration to the next level: the brand-new Bosch Performance Line Gen 5 motor is now completely integrated into the carbon frame, while the shock has moved into the seat tube and is now positioned vertically. A distinctive feature of the ST variant with more travel is the visible piggyback-reservoir on the shock, which peeks out from the plastic cover by the seat tube. In purely visual terms, the bike appears compact with its integrated components but still sporty and high-performing – like a stocky heavyweight fighter standing just 1.65 m tall. This impression is enhanced by the clever paint scheme, which slims down the bulky area around the seat tube, at least visually.

As you’d expect from SCOTT, the cables and brake lines are fully integrated and disappear into the frame through the headset under a seamless plastic cover that also encloses the entire stem. This underlines the bike’s clean look. However, integration also has its drawbacks, making servicing more challenging, especially since the Patron’s cockpit is brimming with features. Alongside the brake levers and dropper post, there’s the TracLoc lever, which allows you to stiffen up the shock in three stages. The lever is combined with the dropper remote, which is pretty clever but also means two additional cables.

The special FOX Float X NUDE shock of the SCOTT Patron features all usual controls, like the compression and rebound dials and the air valve, which are all conveniently accessible through the cover’s opening. This layout and the remote-controlled lockout were custom-designed for SCOTT. As mentioned before, the climb switch lever is conveniently located in the TracLoc lever on the handlebars, allowing you to adjust the shock in two stages. SCOTT also added a clever sag indicator on the rear linkage, which makes it easier to set up the internal shock. Inside the frame, the shock is protected from dirt while doing its job.

The ribbed chainstay protector of the SCOTT Patron prevents paint chips and chain slap, ensuring a quiet ride on the trail. The new Bosch CX motor also contributes to the quiet riding experience, since the German motor specialist finally eliminated the clunking noise of its predecessor. For night rides, SCOTT also integrated two taillights into the small rear fender, which draw their power directly from the bike’s main battery and are almost invisible until activated. And for those planning longer rides, there’s enough room in the main frame triangle to accommodate a standard-sized water bottle – a crucial feature for epic tours.

The Bosch Performance Line CX Motor System of the 2025 SCOTT Patron

The 2025 SCOTT Patron eRide features the latest, fifth-generation Bosch Performance Line CX motor, which delivers 600 W peak power and 85 Nm of torque, delivering powerful assistance even at low cadences. Best of all: the annoying clunking noise its predecessor makes when riding downhill is finally a thing of the past. The motor sits low and discreetly within the frame, where it’s protected by a robust plastic cover. This cover has generous cutouts at the front to ensure consistent cooling.

The large Bosch PowerTube 800-Wh battery is integrated into the downtube and can be easily removed from the frame using a big, magnetic cover with a key lock. The side-mounted keyhole that secures the battery against theft could have benefited from an additional cover to improve aesthetics. If you need more capacity for a longer range, you can use the optional 250 Wh Bosch PowerMore range extender – though this means sacrificing your water bottle in the frame. The battery’s charging port is located above the motor and protected by a simple but effective twist-lock cover.

The motor is paired with a wireless Mini-Remote on the left side of the handlebar, which allows you to switch between the four support modes. This is complemented by a Bosch System Controller on the top tube, which uses coloured LEDs to display both the battery charge status and the current support mode. Unlike other models, our test bike and all ST variants forego an elaborate colour display, like the Kiox 300, in favour of a more streamlined, performance-focused setup.

The specs of our 2025 SCOTT Patron ST 900 Tuned test bike

The Patron ST 900 Tuned flagship model comes equipped with top-tier components. The FOX 38 Factory Grip X2 fork boasts a fancy Kashima coating and offers countless adjustment options, including high- and low-speed compression and rebound, allowing you to fine-tune the fork to suit your preferences and riding style. The fork is paired with a matching FOX FLOAT X NUDE Factory shock with piggyback and Kashima, which was developed specifically for the Patron by FOX in close collaboration with SCOTT. It features three modes (Climb, Ramp Control, and Descend) and an oversized air chamber for optimal performance. The Syncros Duncan Dropper Post 1.5S, which has 180 mm of travel on frame size L, works reliably.

When it comes to the brakes, the options are rather limited, because Bosch’s eBike ABS Pro system is only compatible with MAGURA or TRP hardware. SCOTT opted for MAGURA MT7 four-piston brakes, which deliver powerful performance and maximum front-wheel control, even on slippery terrain. The front brake is paired with a massive 220 mm MDR-P rotor, while the rear bites on a 203 mm disc. However, these large, floating rotors can occasionally vibrate and make a weird “singing” sound.

For the drivetrain, SCOTT chose SRAM’s wireless GX Eagle AXS Transmission, which delivers butter-smooth, precise shifting, even under load. For the wheels, SCOTT rely on a robust, ebike-specific Syncros Revelstoke-E 1.5 alloy wheelset and premium Schwalbe tires, with a Magic Mary in the softest, super-grippy Ultra Soft compound at the front, and a Schwalbe Albert Trail in the durable Soft compound at the rear, both in the robust Super Gravity casing – the ideal setup if you want to run low pressures without destroying your rims and tires. Our test bike weighs 24.3 kg in the ST 900 Tuned configuration and retails at an eye-watering € 10,999.

All the spec variants of the 2025 SCOTT Patron

The 2025 SCOTT Patron eRide is available in six different spec variants, which differ above all in suspension travel, frame material, and components. The key distinctions lie in the travel categories – with 170/150 mm for the three ST variants and 150/150 mm for the other three models – as well as the mix of carbon and aluminium used for the frames and rear triangles. Only the flagship Tuned model and the Patron ST 900 RC feature full-carbon frames, including the swingarm. The two-step TracLoc lever comes standard with all models, except for the Patron ST 910. All versions share the same motor and battery setup, with an 800 Wh power pack and Bosch Performance Line CX Gen 5 motor.

The ST models focus on performance and forgo a handlebar display in favour of a minimalist approach, while the other configurations come with Bosch Intuvia 100 or, on the more expensive models, a Kiox 300 display. Depending on the specs, the bikes are available in ten different colours.

The SCOTT Patron 920 is the entry-level model in the range, and generates 150 mm of travel front and rear. It relies on a full aluminium frame, a RockShox Psylo fork, a X-FUSION shock, and a Shimano Deore drivetrain. The spec is basic, and the suspension components allow for fewer adjustment options, struggling to deliver the same awesome performance on the trail as their top-tier counterparts. As such, it’s better suited for less demanding riders who can live with just a rebound adjustment on the shock and compression and rebound on the fork. However, all this comes at an attractive price of € 5,999 and a moderate weight of 25.8 kg.

The SCOTT Patron 910 is the mid-range model. It combines a carbon main frame with an aluminium swingarm, and comes equipped with a FOX 36 Rhythm fork and FOX Float shock, which only have externally-adjustable compression and rebound settings (fork) and rebound (shock). The wireless, electronic SRAM Eagle AXS S1000 drivetrain ensures smooth shifting and only requires minimal maintenance, which makes it an appealing choice for riders who want to avoid regular servicing. Weighing in at 24.3 kg – the same as our test bike – it offers great value at € 7,699.

The SCOTT Patron 900 is the most versatile option for riders seeking a good balance of performance and weight. With a carbon main frame, FOX suspension and 150 mm of travel front and rear, it offers a wider adjustment spectrum. The FOX 36 Performance fork has compression and rebound adjustments, as does the FOX NUDE shock. The Bosch ABS Pro braking assistance enhances safety on the trail, particularly for beginners. Retailing at € 8,799, the SCOTT Patron 900 strikes a good balance between quality components and a reasonable weight of 24.4 kg.

The ST series is aimed at riders who want more travel at the front, and is built for demanding descents. The SCOTT Patron ST 910 features a full aluminium frame, which makes it significantly cheaper than other ST models, retailing at € 6,499. However, at 25.9 kg, it’s the heaviest model in the entire Patron range. The suspension consists of a RockShox Domain R fork and RockShox SuperDeluxe shock – the only RockShox shock in the lineup. Unfortunately, both suspension elements only have a rebound adjustment, while the shock isn’t compatible with the TracLoc system. The Shimano Deore drivetrain rounds out the build, making it a good entry point for riders exploring SCOTT’s fully integrated Patron e-bikes.

For experienced riders who focus on fast lap times, the SCOTT Patron ST 900 RC is an excellent choice. It combines 170/150 mm of travel and relies on performance-oriented components. The full-carbon frame helps reduce weight compared to the ST 910, bringing it down to a moderate 24.6 kg. The FOX suspension setup – a 38 Performance Elite fork and a FOX Float X NUDE shock – offers the same adjustability options as our test bike but forgoes the fancy Kashima coating. Priced at € 9,499, the ST 900 RC is the ideal choice for performance-driven riders who are happy to renounce technical features like the ABS braking system.

A close relative to the new SCOTT Patron is the SCOTT AXIS FS. This fully equipped eMTB shares the same frame platform as the new Patron but comes standard with mudguards, a rear pannier rack, and integrated head- and tail-lights. It’s the ideal companion for commuters who want to mix in some light trails on their way to work and incorporate an ebike into their daily routine. The two AXIS FS variants cost 6.199 € and 7.299 €.

The Geometry of the 2025 SCOTT Patron ST

The SCOTT Patron ST is available in four frame sizes, S to XL. Reach values vary significantly, increasing by 20 mm per size, from 428 mm in size S to 503 mm in size XL. Size L has 474 mm reach, ensuring a comfortable yet sporty riding position. The head angle sits at 64.9° in the slack position and can be adjusted by +0.6° using the integrated angle headset cups. Conveniently, no additional tools or accessories are required for this adjustment. Based on our last major E-MOUNTAINBIKE group test, this value is pretty average. The chainstays remain constant at 454 mm across all sizes, and don’t grow with the frame size. Our test bike in size L combines a 470 mm seat tube and 180 mm dropper post, which can slightly limit movement on the trail.

The new 2025 SCOTT Patron on the trai

The 2025 SCOTT Patron feels intuitive right from the get go, with the central riding position integrating you nicely with the bike, and providing excellent control. With the dropper post fully extended, you’re positioned slightly forward – perfect for an active riding style with enough weight on the front wheel for steeper climbs. The Bosch Performance Line CX Gen 5 motor delivers powerful assistance, with the extended boost feature of the e-MTB mode making it easy to negotiate technical ascents. Additionally, the rear wheel maintains traction even with aggressive pedal strokes.

For even better climbing performance, two clicks on the TracLoc remote switch the suspension to Climb mode. This slows rebound and increases compression without locking the shock entirely. This setting keeps the shock higher in its travel, and prevents the front end from lifting on steep technical sections, allowing you to negotiate even the most demanding climbs without having to shift your weight too much.

When gravity takes over, a quick switch from Climb mode to Descend mode via the upper TracLoc lever restores the suspension’s capabilities, while the lower lever drops the seat post. On the trails, the bike’s low, central centre of gravity ensures a planted feel, allowing for intuitive cornering and nimble handling through tight switchbacks. In fast, steep sections and technical trails, the SCOTT eRide is incredibly composed.

The Bosch eBike ABS Pro system subtly intervenes under hard braking, allowing you to steer without too much effort while at the same time ensuring good traction on the front wheel. This is a game-changer in gnarly trail scenarios, eliminating the rattling brake lever sensation typical of earlier ABS systems. Post-ride, the Bosch eBike Flow app provides insights into braking performance and the number of ABS interventions.

On flowy trails with pump sections and small jumps, the rear suspension of the Patron feels soft and offers little support. Switching to the middle position on the TracLoc lever activates Ramp Control, increasing compression and providing more resistance from the suspension. This adjustment ensures a more dynamic ride, and allows you to build up speed without the suspension swallowing up your energy like a sand bag.

Who should take a closer look at the new 2025 SCOTT Patron?

The 2025 SCOTT Patron eRide caters to a wide range of riders who value both sporty performance and high levels of comfort, integration, and technology. It’s a great choice for active commuters who want to ride quickly and commute to work in great style while incorporating some trail miles along the way. Features like the permanently integrated tail light and pre-installed front light cable make the Patron practical straight out of the box. Riders seeking more everyday utility might want to take a closer look at the SCOTT AXIS FS.

Tech enthusiasts and integration freaks will also find the Patron appealing. The fully-integrated motor, battery, and shock, along with the discreet cable routing and thoughtful details, are true eye-candy for anyone with a soft-spot for design and cohesive aesthetics.

Conclusions about the new 2025 SCOTT Patron

The 2025 SCOTT Patron eRide impresses with excellent control on the trail and comfort, both in the city and beyond the tarmac. The Bosch Performance Line CX Gen 5 motor provides powerful uphill support, while the TracLoc system allows the suspension to adapt quickly to changing riding conditions – though it requires some dexterity. The intuitive handling and low centre of gravity ensure a safe ride, further enhanced by the Bosch eBike ABS Pro system. If you’re looking for a versatile eMTB with a focus on safety and integration, the Patron is sure to deliver plenty of fun.

Tops

• Wide range of applications
• Intuitive handling
• Multiple configurations for beginners and advanced riders

Flops

• High complexity for maintenance

For more information, visit scott-sports.com

Der Beitrag New 2025 SCOTT Patron on test erschien zuerst auf E-MOUNTAINBIKE Magazine.

Range anxiety was one of the key drivers of e-bike motor development for years. And understandably so! Who wants to get stuck in the middle of the woods with a dead battery? The industry’s answer: bigger batteries and more powerful motors. Bikes like the Canyon Spectral:ON and ROTWILD R.X1000, which boast capacities of over 900 Wh, quickly became a trend and a common sight on the trails. However, this came at a cost: instead of getting lighter, many eMTBs became significantly heavier over the years, losing agility and balance in the process.

No trend goes without a countertrend. This pushback started early but took several years to pick up steam. As early as 2016, the first prototypes emerged, all built around the FAZUA motor, the real pioneer in the light-assistance segment. FOCUS were the first brand to bring this concept to the trails with the Raven² Pro in 2017. A year later, Lapierre unveiled the eZesty AM LTD, the first Light eMTB designed specifically for trail riding, thus opening up a new horizon for the bike industry. By 2020, bike colossus Specialized joined the movement with the first generation of the Levo SL – a major step forward for the still-emerging segment.

The concept was clear: less motor power meant less energy consumption. The result? Smaller, lighter batteries and motors, better integration, and sleeker aesthetics. The specs of those early motors? Around 40 Nm of torque and up to 250 watts peak power. The vision? Lightweight eMTBs combining a natural ride feel and sleek aesthetics that would make it hard to distinguish electric bikes from their analogue counterparts.

The Light eMTB trend truly gained momentum in 2022 and 2023 when TQ introduced the HRP50, Fazua launched the Ride 60, and Bosch followed suit a year later with the SX drive. These innovations ushered in a new generation of Light eMTBs in countless different configurations. But what is it that truly defines a Light eMTB? Is it the smaller, weaker motor, the compact and lighter battery, or simply the bike’s overall lighter system weight?

As early as 2020, bikes like the Orbea Rise and ROTWILD R.X375 showed that combining a full-power motor with intelligent battery designs, throttled motor output, and energy-efficient riding profiles could bring outstanding results.

Our comprehensive 2024 Light eMTB comparison test highlights this very transformation: modern designs with powerful motors, sufficient battery capacity, and robust components no longer have to come with a hefty weight penalty. The current Orbea Rise LT has proven exactly that: a low system weight and full motor power are no longer mutually exclusive. Shortly after our test, this shift became even more evident at Eurobike 2024. Newly introduced models, like the Amflow PL Carbon Pro, confirmed our findings and demonstrated that development is not only advancing but reaching entirely new dimensions.

This shift is also evident in our E-bike motor comparison test, where–for the first time in seven years–a clear winner emerged, and for very good reasons. Imagine a motor system that is more powerful than existing full-power drives and yet lightweight and compact enough to compete in the Light eMTB segment. Curtain up for the DJI Avinox M1 motor. Developed by Chinese tech giant DJI, which is best known for their drones, gimbals, and video gadgets, this groundbreaking motor is shaking up the market and offering a glimpse into the future direction of the entire eMTB industry. The question of choosing between light or full-assistance motors is now largely obsolete, with only a few exceptions remaining.

New players like DJI are shaking up the market and heavily driving innovation forward. The DJI Avinox M1 motor, featured in the Amflow PL Carbon Pro, weighs just 2.52 kg, which makes it several hundred grams lighter than comparable motors. For example, the Bosch Performance Line CX motor weighs 2.8 kg. Additionally, the compact dimensions of the DJI Avinox motor give bike manufacturers more freedom with frame designs, thus allowing them to build overall sleekerbikes.

Advancements in cell technology have also made e-bike batteries significantly lighter. DJI’s in-house battery technology achieves an impressively low weight, with their big 800Wh battery tipping the scales at just 3.7 kg– well below the 4 kg mark typical of most competitors.

DJI not only excel in hardware but also stand out with their user-friendly software, which sets them apart from the competition. While many drive systems struggle with complex menus and cumbersome controls, DJI prioritize intuitive operation. Customizable settings, firmware updates, and security features like GPS tracking can all be managed easily through a dedicated app. Additionally, the option to insert a SIM card unlocks features like remote access and bike tracking. This level of user-friendliness elevates the riding experience, making it accessible even to less tech-savvy users. Already with their drones, DJI have proved their ability to make highly sophisticated technology incredibly easy to use. If a company can keep flying objects stable and make them easy to control in the air, they certainly have the skills to ensure excellent handling on the ground, even in slippery conditions. With the Avinox M1 motor, DJI has already established a new benchmark in this regard.

Perfect in every way? Not just yet. Despite the outstanding product features and usability, DJI still have to prove themselves in the eMTB segment in terms of durability and service quality to compete with established players like Bosch. These factors are critical, especially in a product like an eMTB, which has to endure intense demands.

Back to motor development: Full-power motors have held a key advantage over Light eMTBs over recent years– demand. Higher demand translated to significantly larger production volumes, which in turn drove down prices. This puts additional pressure on the Light eMTB segment. Thanks to greater production scales in motor and battery manufacturing, along with bulk purchasing by bike manufacturers, full-power eMTBs are already more affordable than Light eMTBs with comparable specs. And this trend shows no signs of slowing.

In the case of DJI and Amflow, there’s another factor to consider. While DJI aim to primarily position themselves as a motor supplier for established bike brands, their in-house bike brand Amflow gives them a distinct price advantage. Currently available in Germany, the UK, and Australia, the Amflow flagship model, weighing 20.3 kg in size L, retails at € 9,999,which is significantly cheaper than the €14,000+ price tags of many top-tier Light eMTBs. Meanwhile, the entry-level Amflow PL Carbon model, priced at just €6,499, delivers trail and motor performance close to its flagship sibling while maintaining a lightweight 21.2 kg according to the manufacturer. By contrast, with Light eMTBs, you’ll usually have to buy the most expensive spec variant to fully get a superlight bike. With more affordable models, which usually feature heavier components, you’ll quickly find yourself well over the 21 kg mark.

Light systems have driven motor and battery development in many ways. However, therapid pace of innovation has ultimately dug their grave. That said, light systems won’t disappear entirely from the face of the earth, and some manufacturers will continue to rely on them in the future– particularly for XC-specific concepts like the Thömus Lightrider and SCOTT Lumen, and especially in the gravel and road bike sectors. But in the downhill-oriented eMTB category, low-torque Light eMTBs and small batteries are now a thing of the past.

The direction is clear: the next generation of eMTBs unites what were once opposites– power, range, and lightness. While Light eMTBs will retain their place in niche markets, motor systems like the DJI Avinox represent the next big step in evolution. Although DJI still need to prove themselves in terms of durability and service, the future belongs to versatile all-rounders that open up new possibilities. The best news for everyone: the new generation of eMTBs promises to be even more fun!

Motor development is far from over– and the exciting part is that we, as the E-MOUNTAINBIKE Magazine, and you, as our readers and riders, can influence its future too. Let us know what you want to see in the years to come. What do you think of the current trends? What ideas, features, and requirements do you wish for?
Click here to take part in our survey and help shape the future of E-MTBs!

Der Beitrag Are full-power eMTBs the new light eMTBs? – Checkmate! erschien zuerst auf E-MOUNTAINBIKE Magazine.

Crazy. We vividly remember that moment in July 2024, when the house of cards suddenly collapsed, and years of rock-solid conviction began to crumble. It was late at night, we were sitting in the lobby of the Gekko House hotel in Frankfurt. Once again, several new e-bike motors had been presented at Eurobike 2024, and we were the only magazine to be granted the opportunity to test a newcomer in the Taunus mountain range. Exclusively. Peter and Mike walked into the hotel lobby, covered in mud and still in their riding gear, sharing their first impressions. And one thing was immediately clear: some of the competitors are in for a serious wake-up call!

“The best e-bike motor for eMTBs doesn’t exist…”

2017 was the last year we crowned a winner in our motor comparison test. After that, it simply wasn’t feasible anymore. Our reason at the time: “There’s no longer a single best e-mountain bike motor; the market has diversified too much, and with the vast range of customization options, isolated evaluation of individual models makes little sense. Ultimately, the best motor is only as good as the bike it powers. If the bike’s core design is flawed, even the best motor won’t make it a great e-mountain bike.”

This still holds true today.

But what if…

…there were an ultimate eMTB motor? An e-bike motor capable of uniting seemingly contradictory qualities to outperform all other motors currently available on the market in many ways? A significantly more powerful motor that is also easier to control than any competitor? A motor with a much higher power-to-weight ratio? More app features combined with outstanding usability? And an integration that would make even the current market leaders look outdated? The ultimate question: does such a motor exist? Or just on the paper?”

Spoiler: Not only does the best e-bike motor of 2025 exist, but…

Forget the whole “opposites attract” yada yada – opposites can be united! The first representatives of a new generation of e-bike motors manage to combine all the qualities mentioned above. However, there are still open questions and uncertainties that only the 2025 season will answer. The fact is, not only have these new motor systems emerged, but are also leading to significantly better bikes that are easier to ride and more capable!

However, where there are winners, there are also losers: a bioproduct of this development is that light-support eMTBs are losing their relevance. Our 2024 light E-MTB comparison test with nine exciting bikes already showed that the era of light-support motors is coming to an end, and the choice between light-support and full-power is, in many respects, already becoming obsolete. At the same time, the overall design of the bike, together with the battery concept, is gaining increasing importance.

​​The good news: 2025 is set to be an outstanding year for e-mountain bikers, and from a technology standpoint alone, it’s well worth investing in a next-generation eMTB! Here’s a little teaser: for 2025, we have a clear winner in our well-known, extensive motor comparison test. And a best-buy recommendation too! Just keep reading to find out more! But remember: every motor is only as good as the bike its part of. And for the math-enthusiasts amongst us, we even have an equation:

Shit bike + awesome motor = Shit bike

2025 as the year of reckoning: a survival and positioning battle for motor manufacturers

Who’s got the stamina to succeed? For many motor manufacturers, 2025 is all or nothing! This model year brings more motor manufacturers than ever, numerous updates, and some incredibly exciting newcomers– which makes for an exceptionally fierce competition.

In fact, there are currently more motor manufacturers than bike brands can absorb. Development costs are still high, and on top of that, bike brands are currently acting prudently. Not because the bike market is performing poorly per se, but because projections are not being met, and some large manufacturers’ inventories remained overstocked from recent years. The critical question is: who’s betting on the right technology and can deliver a cohesive package that goes far beyond delivering maximum performance or successful integration and connectivity? Ultimately, it’s the details – and, of course, price points – that lead some bike brands to forgo even high-quality motors or regret their choices. Many motor manufacturers stumble because they produce motors with excellent performance but lack a globally functioning service network. In the end, it takes a strong overall package, not just a good motor.

This raises an exciting question: which motor brands will bike manufacturers actually choose to integrate and feature on their bikes over the coming years? Without a doubt, the pressure on motor manufacturers is massive – and that’s a good thing, especially for end users. Competition drives the market and, in the mid to long term, fosters innovation.

Always up to date: Our extensive e-bike motor comparison test

Our comprehensive motor comparison test includes all relevant systems currently available on the market, and is constantly updated to include the latest motor systems. The goal of this e-bike motor comparison is to provide you with the ultimate market overview, detailing the features, capabilities, strengths, and weaknesses of each system to fully support you in choosing your (next) eMTB. In addition to previously tested systems from Bosch, Brose, FAZUA, GIANT, Panasonic, Pinion, Shimano, Specialized, TQ, and Yamaha, we’re now adding the exciting new DJI Avinox and the Bosch Performance Line CX Gen5 motor. We were also the only magazine to test the ZF Bike Eco System in the new R RAYMON Tarok eMTB, though not yet in the lab or in direct comparison with its competitors – but don’t worry, we’ll catch up on that as soon as the motor is available!

Our test field – These are the e-bike motors we’ve tested

All ebike motors in the lab and on the trail: real-world insights beyond theory!

For our e-bike motor comparison test, we completed countless test runs with all motor systems, covering thousands of vertical metres, both up and downhill. We used the same test track for all motors to ensure consistent benchmarking, and used the same motors on different bikes and all types of terrain. But why on different bikes? Not every motor performs the same on every bike– the strengths and weaknesses of a drive also depend on the bike’s characteristics and overall concept. No other magazine tests such a large selection of current eMTBs as intensively or for as long as we do. As a result, we’ve built up extensive experience with numerous motor systems over months and years.

We also took over the lab at the renowned Velotec testing institute to put all motors through the wringer paces on the test bench. However, if you’re expecting large-scale graphs, we’ll have to disappoint you – or rather, educate you like a teacher: isolated data and impressive charts might look great might be very popular amongst some of our readers, but they rarely reflect the complex reality of an eMTB on the trail. Such charts often lead to premature and incorrect conclusions and should therefore ALWAYS be approached with caution.

There’s one clear reason for this: unlike a car, an eMTB is a human/machine hybrid. And since no two riders are alike, there are countless individual factors that influence how a motor performs and feels in real live scenarios. Even with cars, acceleration and horsepower figures alone say very little about how a vehicle handles on a racetrack, how well it corners, or how it performs under varying road conditions. That’s why we’ve carefully integrated the lab-test results into each test report, as they help support our practical insights and can add extra context. But generally speaking, what you don’t feel or perceive on the trail is just theory!

Top 7 – What Makes a good eMTB motor?

A high-quality motor system is made up of numerous critical factors that have a significant impact on the riding experience. But which features are especially important for getting the most out of your eMTB? Here are the top 7!

1. Power specs impress, but riding enjoyment rules.

Let’s start with the motor itself: raw performance data such as torque and peak power have the same allure as a car engine’s horsepower. Yet they should never take top priority. Whether you’re a beginner or a seasoned trail veteran, and whether you prioritise safety or speed, response behaviour, modulation, and power delivery are at least as important as power output and torque. Unfortunately, these qualities can’t be quantified in simple numbers. Optimal cadence range may serve as an indicator, but ultimately, many different factors come into play.

Here’s the background: some motors only reach full power at high pedalling cadences or respond poorly to pedalling asymmetries, meaning that certain riding styles may not allow you to draw the motor’s full power. Other motors, however, adapt better to some riding habits and enable less frequent and precise shifting, as their power is sufficient to handle even suboptimal cadences.

2. Your motor’s soundtrack: loud or quiet?

Another key factor is the noise and volume of the motor under load. Some drives get relatively loud at certain RPMs and load ranges, while others remain relatively quiet. Then there’s mechanical rattling, which is especially an issue with the Shimano EP801, the older Bosch CX Gen4, and the Bosch CX Race.

3. Batteries à la Carte: Modular battery concepts for every need

Every motor needs power– in other words, a battery. A practical selection of battery options with high energy density and frame-integrated designs is essential. A lightweight, well-integrated motor system offers clear advantages for bike brands, not only to achieve a low centre of gravity and improved handling, but also to create aesthetically pleasing bike designs. Sleek, seamless units or bulky, rectangular protrusions on the downtube or bottom bracket? We definitely have a preference…

Many manufacturers now offer modular battery concepts, which allow you to adjust battery capacity to your needs without carrying the extra weight of oversized batteries. Range extenders are a great option to expand the integrated battery. Furthermore, some bike brands design their models so customers can select the base battery size as well. One of them is Basque manufacturer Orbea, which secured the coveted ‘Best eMTB of 2024’ title in our extensive eMTB comparison test with the Orbea Wild, as well as the ‘Best Light eMTB of 2024’ with the Orbea Rise LT.

Using Orbea’s online configurator, both the Wild with its Bosch motor, and the Rise with its Shimano drive, can be configured with two different battery sizes and the additional range extender, which can be carried inside the bottle cage. Other brands like Merida, Moustache, FOCUS, Canyon, and newcomer Amflow give you different battery size options too –which we highly welcome. After all, having different options for the main battery is crucial for a bike tailored to individual needs, and an additional range extender ensures you’re prepared for any adventure!

4. Full Control: Smart Features or Frustrating Operation?

The motor’s ‘ecosystem’ determines whether handling is a pleasure or a pain. User-friendly remotes paired with an informative, clear, and easy-to-read display bring joy, while bulky, poorly placed remotes with oversized displays that add no value can be extremely. Intuitive apps make it simple to customise the motor’s characteristics, provide additional ride data and information, or even alert users about system errors. Extra features like smart navigation and integrated theft protection (with alarm and GPS) open up new possibilities for both daily use and adventures, giving you peace of mind when leaving your beloved bike unattended at a mountain hut for a quick break.

User needs vary greatly too: some want high information density and full functionality on their display, while others prefer a minimalist setup.

5. Additional hardware features of e-bike motors

Apart from integrating software features, some manufacturers go one step further and integrate other bike components like the drivetrain and brakes. Shimano and Bosch have their own ABS systems, which improve safety especially on loose surfaces. Bosch take it one step further and offer two different systems: the Bosch ABS is for moderate tours, while the ABS Pro is designed for trail riding – and delivers an impressive performance. Drivetrain specialists Shimano and SRAM not only have their own motor system, but are also integrating their drivetrains with an automatic function and other features into their ecosystem. We have already tested both systems in a direct comparison to tell you what the differences are and which eMTB rider types can benefit from an automatic drivetrain. Bosch, too, followed suit in summer 2024, developing the automatic Bosch eShift system in close collaboration with TRP. Pinion integrate the autoshift feature directly into their motor-gearbox unit, but other manufacturers also offer exciting e-bike motors with integrated gear shifting, which we have already tested in direct comparison.

6. When things go wrong: Spare parts and service for your e-bike motor

Beyond handling and usability, the technical design and redundancy of certain components are crucial too: can the bike still be powered on and used if, for example, the remote is damaged in a crash? The same goes for both external and internal battery charging. After-sales support and ease of maintenance play a vital role here, as spare parts and reliable local service are essential. Many of us keep our bikes for years, making these indispensable factors. Depending on where you live and ride, certain brands may not be viable options due to a lack of service. Some smart bike manufacturers even choose not to offer certain models in regions where service quality is poor, avoiding frustration for customers.

When buying, it’s critical to consider system reliability and the service network, especially if you’re outside the main e-bike markets like Central Europe. While service is often excellent there, it can be abysmal for some brands in more remote regions. In our e-bike motor comparison test, Bosch, Shimano, Specialized, and GIANT currently lead in service availability.

All these factors combined give each motor system in our comparison its own unique character. Price is also an important criterion, although a rather hard one to view in isolation since you’re purchasing a complete bike, not just the motor. Still, there are substantial differences in this regard too.

7. Pickier than Tinder: Find your perfect motor System match

Balancing act or specialty? Ultimately, the right motor system depends on the needs of each rider–you just need to find your match. While some e-bike motors cater to niche uses, focusing on low weight and ultra-sleek integration to the point where it’s nearly indistinguishable from a traditional bike, others are all-rounders that appeal to a wide range of riders.

But beware! We can’t stress this enough: don’t just buy a bike with closed eyes because of the motor system. The motor is only one cog in a larger machine, which only works as a cohesive package in conjunction with other components. Understanding these relationships is key to appreciating the bikes. That’s also good advice for Tinder

For more, check out our extensive E-MTB comparison test– the most comprehensive E-MTB test around the globe!

Shit bike + awesome motor = Shit bike: A Brief exposition

Before diving into the motors, we need to take a quick detour to discuss the latest generation of eMTBs and motor concepts. In summer 2024, we conducted our large light e-MTB comparison test with 9 current models. The shocking realisation? The era of light eMTBs is coming to an end.

With the latest generation of motor systems and battery concepts, categorization is no longer necessary: Light eMTBs may have been in the spotlight for the past few years, and were considered the pinnacle of innovation, but now they’re on the verge of extinction. Full-power motor systems are becoming increasingly smaller, more powerful, and lighter, rendering traditional ‘light support’ systems on eMTBs irrelevant in the long run. And it makes sense: why ride with a weaker motor and smaller battery when there are bikes with more power and greater battery capacity at nearly the same weight?

As mentioned above, the battery concept is becoming ever more crucial, even determining whether a bike qualifies as a light eMTB. Our 2024 light eMTB comparison test made this abundantly clear, with many lightweight eMTBs featuring full-power motors excelling in the rankings! Since our latest comparison test, several more motors have been introduced that push the boundaries even further.

How much battery capacity and motor power do I need?

Over recent years, battery capacity has been one of the hottest topics in the eMTB world. After engaging in a fierce battery arms race, most manufacturers have now settled on a balanced approach and offer a wide range of options to customers. What’s exciting: there’s a lot happening with batteries, and the differences are growing!

Earlier, we discussed modular battery concepts, integration, and energy density– and we’ll continue exploring these themes in this chapter! Let’s start with four common battery myths:

1. The bigger the battery, the bigger the range?

Trick question: Which battery capacity will take you farther – 320 Wh or 700 Wh? The only correct response is another question: with what motor is it paired? Isolated numbers tempt us to draw premature conclusions. There are many reasons why comparing battery sizes across different motor systems doesn’t make sense.

While battery capacity is an important reference point, range can only be accurately assessed in conjunction with the motor and its output. There are significant differences in both motor efficiency and power output.

If you ride a Bosch SX motor with a 400 Wh battery at a relaxed pace, you can actually achieve impressive range. But if you push it, drawing out its 600 W peak power over an extended period of time, you’ll quickly see the range estimates on your display plummet. This makes sense: it has the same peak power as its larger Bosch sibling, the CX. The maths is straightforward: higher energy consumption per hour (in watts) reduces the ride time before the 400 Wh battery runs out.

It’s the same story with a Specialized SL 1.2 motor and 320 Wh battery, though its maximum output is 240 W, which means that, mathematically, it can’t consume more than 240 Wh per hour at full power. This gives you, theoretically, about 1 hour and 20 minutes of ride time at maximum output before the battery depletes.

In real-world conditions, actual range depends on numerous factors such as efficiency, support level, rider weight, terrain, topography, cadence, pedalling style, bike components, and more. Additionally, many motor manufacturers don’t specify battery capacity precisely– either for marketing reasons or because incremental improvements in cell design and chemistry can increase actual capacity even within a model year.

2. The bigger the battery, the heavier the bike?

Really? While this rule of thumb held true for years, there are now significant differences in energy density– the battery capacity divided by battery weight (Wh/kg). This is due to several factors: the type of cells used and their chemistry, as well as the design, casing, and all safety-related technology. Another factor is how well the battery integrates into the bike, and the additional hardware required, like the mounts and brackets. After all, where’s the point in having a lightweight battery if the integration adds substantial weight to the frame? That’s why providing a table of different battery weights wouldn’t make much sense!

3. Power, weight, range– Pick two!

Not only does the size of the battery affect range but also plays a crucial role in the bike’s handling. This is why some bike manufacturers combine a full-power motor with a smaller battery, sometimes limiting the motor’s power via software slightly. This setup combines the punch of a powerful motor with a lighter overall package and the associated benefits. Good examples include the Orbea Rise LT, the Cannondale Moterra SL with the Shimano EP801, and the GIANT SyncDrive Pro2. If you enjoy short, punchy climbs and value more natural handling on descents, these could be great options.

As you can see, a strict categorization isn’t possible and always depends on the bike manufacturer’s implementation. Motors like the FAZUA Ride 60 and Bosch SX are designed as hybrid drives that want to strike the balance between weight and power. The Bosch Performance Line SX motor, for example, falls squarely in the ‘minimal-assist’ weight class while delivering peak performance closer to full-power motors. For sporty riding, it can even hold its own against many full-power motors.

If you’re after a light footed feel and opt for a light-support motor like the TQ HPR50, make sure it’s installed in a lightweight bike. Depending on how extreme you plan to go off-road, durability and component ruggedness are essential. Conversely, the bike’s nimble handling will be compromised if you add the heaviest motor system with a large, heavy battery. Avoid limiting yourself to two simple categories, and, instead, explore the diversity among systems and find the combination that best suits you.

Do you want powerful torque for the steepest technical climbs or gentler power for relaxed rides? A big battery for long tours or a smaller one for short trips and more natural handling? Full control and extensive riding data on the handlebar display, or a minimalist display-remote solution with a clean look? How much do you value the adjustability options of a motor system? Do you want to be able to fine-tune its behaviour to suit your needs, or are you happy with just hopping on and riding? Only you can answer these questions for yourself. With our e-bike motor comparison test, we aim to help you find the right product for your requirements and avoid costly mistakes or frustration.

4. Bonus: Power, weight, range– Choose all three!

The new DJI Avinox motor is the first of a new generation of motors where you no longer have to choose between maximum power, low weight, and long range. In the AMFLOW PL Carbon – the only bike currently available with the Avinox motor– you can already see where this journey is headed! Which brings us directly to the crucial question:

What’s the best e-bike motor of 2025?

The best shoe is worthless if it doesn’t fit comfortably. And it’s the same story with e-bike motors, with one key difference: not only must a motor suit your riding style and personal needs, but also match the character and overall design of the bike.

Highlights and lowlights of the e-bike motors from Our 2025 Comparison Test

Below, we provide an overview of the standout highlights and lowlights from our motor test field. This overview doesn’t aim to be exhaustive but rather to focus on specific features and qualities that either impressed or disappointed us, giving you a snapshot of what the current market offers.

Tops

Flops

The ultimate overview – e-bike motor comparison test

To provide you with a comprehensive overview of all relevant e-bike motors and essential insights for your next bike purchase, we’ll now break down each motor we tested, highlighting unique features, strengths, and weaknesses.

The crown jewel of this chapter: for the first time in seven years, we’re awarding both a Best in Test and BestBuy recommendation. Why now? Because we’re at the dawn of a new generation of e-bike motors, which combine the best of light-support and full-power systems or presenting complete, well-rounded motor setups that simplify the final buying decision– or at least point you in the right direction. Ultimately, remember that any motor is only as good as the bike it’s part of.

We’ve already explained that modern e-bike motors can be both lightweight and powerful. A bike’s character depends not only on the motor but also on the battery concept and the overall bike design – including geometry, kinematics, and components. While the best e-bike motors enable versatile bike concepts, some motors are better suited to specific uses. Below, we group similar motor concepts to provide a market overview and highlight the subtle differences. For a deep dive into each motor, click on the respective links.

Während die besten E-Bike Motoren sehr variable Bike-Konzepte zulassen, sind auch manche Motoren für eher spezielle Einsatzzwecke geeignet. Im Folgenden bündeln wir ähnliche Motorkonzepte, um euch eine Einordnung in den Markt zu geben und die feinen Unterschiede abzubilden. Um noch tiefer in jeden Motor einzutauchen, klickt einfach auf die jeweiligen Links.

The Specialized SL1.2 and TQ HPR50 set the standard for a natural ride feel on e-mountainbikes. Both motors deliver subtle support, even at maximum assistance, and are geared toward a sporty riding style, offering power comparable to the ECO mode of full-power motors. Both require higher pedalling cadence and the right gear choice.

With 60 Nm of torque and 350 W peak power, the FAZUA Ride 60 is amongst the more powerful light-support motors in our test. However, reliability is a major concern, as even with the right technical setup, performance is impacted by system failures. Despite promising specifications and multiple software updates, technical issues with the FAZUA Ride 60 have kept us from giving it a wholehearted recommendation. Similar issues are reported by users in forums like Pinkbike, though few publications are willing to address them openly. FAZUA’s new parent company, Porsche eBike Performance GmbH, is likely devoting most resources to developing its upcoming 2026 Porsche motor, meaning only limited improvements are expected.

The Bosch Performance Line SX feels even more powerful than the FAZUA Ride 60 and offers 600 W of peak power, leaning towards the full-power category. Despite its impressive performance, it is bulkier and not as easy to integrate into the frame as some other light-support drives. Thanks to the extensive configurability and Bosch’s reliable global support network, the Performance Line SX is a very good choice.

The Bosch Performance Line CX is a true classic. The 5th generation, released in fall 2024, is slightly lighter and smaller than its predecessor and includes an improved drivetrain to eliminate mechanical rattling. While delivering the same 85 Nm of torque and 600 W peak power as its predecessor, the CX (Gen5) brings enhancements in sensor technology and responsiveness, while at the same time ensuring a quieter ride.

While the Shimano EP801 doesn’t quite match the Bosch Performance Line CX in terms of sheer power, it excels with easy handling, proving an excellent choice for both beginners and advanced riders. Unlike Bosch, Shimano allow third-party batteries, creating more options for customised battery setups and frame designs. Additionally, the EP801 is available with a race-focused software similar to Bosch’s CX Race. We’re excited to see how it performs on the trail! Alongside the widely popular Shimano EP801 drive, the Japanese manufacturer also OFFERS the MORE COMPACT Shimano EP6 drive. This is almost identical in construction and delivers the same torque as the EP801, but relies on a cheaper and slightly heavier aluminium housing.

The GIANT SyncDrive Pro2, which is based on the Yamaha PW-X3, improves on its original platform with a smoother power delivery. Although the remote and display still lack information density, they are well integrated into the bike.

Until late 2024, the Panasonic GX Ultimate was the most powerful drive in our comparison test, churning out 95 Nm of torque. However, with its abrupt power delivery, it’s challenging to control, thus requiring an experienced rider to control it.

Brose Drive S Mag offers bike manufacturers unparalleled flexibility in motor integration and characteristics. While the overall quality depends heavily on the bike manufacturer’s implementation, the Drive S Mag delivers strong performance, and the model we tested provided a natural ride feel despite its high power.

The Specialized 2.2 motor, which is based on the Brose Drive S Mag, offers powerful torque with controlled power delivery, ranking high in terms of app features and connectivity within our test field.

The Pinion MGU E1.12 combines a responsive motor with Pinion’s internal gear hub. This motor-gearbox unit has the potential to revolutionise the e-bike market, though its somewhat clunky shifting performance currently limits its use primarily to touring bikes, where its low maintenance and smart shifting features shine. For trail-focused eMTBs, it’s less common.

Best Buy: Bosch Performance Line CX (Gen5)

The Bosch Performance Line CX motor has only gotten better with the 5th generation. Thanks to enhanced sensors, refined responsiveness, and a decoupled drivetrain, the Bosch CX (Gen5) is now lighter, slightly smaller, and, finally, quieter! The familiar metallic clunking noise is gone, allowing trail riders to enjoy a quiet descent. With the best global service network and proven technology, the Bosch CX is a rock-solid choice when shopping for a new eMTB, offering outstanding performance, a strong ecosystem, and a variety of battery and range extender options. This system is foolproof– provided you choose a bike that meets your needs!

Best in Test: DJI Avinox e-bike motor

No motor has caused as much buzz this year as the new DJI Avinox. After our initial test in the Taunus mountain range – you may remember that pivotal moment in the Frankfurt hotel lobby – it was clear: this motor plays in a league of its own, not only in terms of specs but also as far as ride performance, connectivity, and usability go. The DJI Avinox system impresses with a user-friendly app packed with features that overshadow the competition.

DJI’s debut is the first of a new generation of e-bike motors that simplify the eMTB market, reduce model lines, and take e-mountainbiking to the next level. Why? Because you no longer have to choose between light or full-power eMTB. In terms of energy density, power, and power-to-weight ratio, the DJI Avinox system outshines every other system currently available on the market– and does so at a very competitive price thanks to Amflow’s direct-to-consumer sales model.

However, as with any new player, there are some questions to be asked: currently, the Avinox system is only available on one bike, and we’re waiting to see when other brands will adopt it. Will a range extender be available in the future? And what about long-term durability and service quality, which are both major challenges for bike manufacturers? Only the future will answer these questions. Additionally, there are regulatory issues regarding operating licences in the U.S., where pending legislation aims to ban DJI drones – a factor preventing some American brands from collaborating with DJI.

These are typical challenges for a new system. The fact remains, though, that DJI’s reputation as a tech and direct-to-consumer brand is well deserved, as evidenced by this impressive debut – an instant game-changer that hints at where the e-bike market is heading. Thus, a well-deserved test victory! Congratulations! 恭喜 DJI!

Next question: what’s the best eMTB of 2025?

Once again, where there are winners, there are losers too. The 2025 model lineup not only offers more power, better customizability and usability, but also allows for better bike designs. From a technical point of view, 2025 is a good year to upgrade to a new eMTB. And even better: new motor systems like the DJI Avinox test winner and Bosch CX Gen5 Best Buy bring an undeniable increase in riding enjoyment!

You already know the equation: a poor bike + great motor = poor bike. That’s why we’re eagerly anticipating our upcoming eMTB comparison test, where we’ll be inviting over 30 of the hottest eMTBsof 2025. After all, the question of the best eMTB motor is always tied to the next question: what’s the best eMTB? We’re on it!

Glossary – The most important eMTB motor terminology and key figures

When discussing eMTB motors, it’s easy to get bogged down in semantics. To understand how these metrics actually affect the ride, we’ll provide you with brief and comprehensible summaries of the most important terms you’ll come across in our eMTB motor comparison test.

The torque of an eMTB motor

Expressed in Newton metres (Nm), torque serves to indicate how powerful a motor is. This key figure determines how vigorously the motor propels you forward on the trail. In practice, the amount of torque available is noticeable when pulling away, or when pedalling on steep uphills in heavy gears – i.e. at low pedalling cadences. Once you reach your cruising cadence, all motors operate well below the maximum torque specified by the manufacturers, and it’s factors like maximum power that play a bigger role. The software also plays a critical role, which is why motors sharing the same specified torque can feel very different on the trail. The best example of this is the Bosch Performance Line CX and CX Race motors, which don’t just have the same basic specs, but also rely on largely the same hardware. However, if you switch to Race mode on the CX Race variant, the power delivery is a lot less restrained, while the response is much more direct compared to the standard Bosch Performance Line CX motor.

The power output of eMTB motors

The power output is given in watts (W) and, in the EU, eMTB motors are limited to a continuous rated output of 250 W. However, this doesn’t mean that eMTB motors can’t exceed the 250-watt limit in “short bursts”. As a result, the maximum power output of all the motors on test is well above 250 W, with many of them capable of churning out more than twice that. A motor’s power output is the product of torque and cadence. This means that the power is heavily dependent on the cadence, i.e. how fast you’re pedalling. Furthermore, there’s a distinction between electrical and mechanical power. The electrical power is the power consumed by the motor, while the mechanical power is the one actually transferred to the ground, minus frictional losses incurred by the motor, drivetrain etc. For comparison’s sake, an average rider puts out about 100 watts of power. If you can produce 150 watts consistently, you can already count yourself among the fitter riders. On technical climbs, our test crew managed to push the power metre needle up to the 350 watt mark. A Tour de France rider can generate over 400 watts average power for an hour….

The assistance ratio of eMTB motors

This is the ratio of the motor’s output to the rider’s input. If a motor delivers 100% support, it matches the rider’s input (rider input times 1), effectively doubling the total output at the rear wheel (100 W rider input plus 100 W motor output equals 200 W total output, not considering energy losses in the form of friction and heat). The more powerful a motor is, the bigger the assistance ratio can be. The most powerful motors can put out up to four times the rider’s power and more. However, this is limited by the motor’s maximum power output, which currently hovers at around 600 W for most full-power motors. Once the eMTB motor reaches that limit, it runs out of steam. So, if you’re putting in 200 W with 400% assistance, the motor won’t magically produce 800 W if its maximum output is 600 W.

The pedalling cadence and eMTB motors

Pedalling cadence is measured in revolutions per minute (RPM) and refers to the speed at which you’re pedalling. Although cadence doesn’t get mentioned nearly as often as torque and power in your typical trailhead tech- talk, it has a major influence on both these fancy-sounding factors. As the cadence increases, the torque decreases, while the power increases until it reaches its peak. Cadence also plays a role in the effectiveness and efficiency of the motor. Most motors are only capable of unleashing their full power over a certain range of cadences. The earlier the full power is available, the better for racers and aggressive riders. That said, mellow riders who like to shuttle to the trailhead at lower cadences will benefit from this too – as long as the power delivery is easy to modulate and control. In addition, every motor has an optimal cadence range at which it performs most efficiently. With most motors, this sweet spot starts at around 60 and goes up to 100 RPM. The optimal cadence range has grown with the latest generation of motors – with exceptions like the Bosch SX. Pedalling within the optimal cadence range improves efficiency and effectiveness, resulting in optimal performance. Note: Speeding up your cadence doesn’t mean that you have to pedal harder – you can also downshift into an easier gear to optimise your pedalling speed. In order to call up all the available power, it’s particularly important to pedal within the optimal cadence range of minimal-assist motors! Several of the manufacturers display the current pedalling cadence on the display.

Sustained assistance of eMTB motors

The sustained assistance of an eMTB motor determines how long the motor keeps on churning after you’ve stopped pedalling. Depending on the motor, the length and power of the sustained assistance varies greatly. However, in the EU, the DIN EN standard limits it to two metres. A long sustained assistance is especially useful in technical terrain, allowing you to get up and over obstacles where you can’t pedal continuously. You can also benefit from the sustained assistance in other situations where you’ve got pedal clearance issues. The speed at which the sustained assistance cuts out ultimately affects the bike’s handling: an abrupt stop can feel like you’re hitting a wall, while a smoother fade-out results in a more natural-feeling experience.

The capacity and energy density of ebike batteries

The battery capacity, expressed in watt-hours (Wh), indicates how long a specified amount of power can be drawn from a battery. In theory, a 750 Wh battery could power a motor with a constant electrical power of 750 W for 1 hour. A minimal-assist motor that can draw a maximum of 300 W of electrical power can theoretically consume no more than 300 Wh per hour. In practice, of course, there are additional variables to consider, such as the ambient temperature, complicating an otherwise simple theory. And, as mentioned above, the mechanical output at the rear wheel is a different story altogether.
You’ve got to be careful when comparing the battery capacities of different bikes. The battery capacity must always be considered in relation to the motor and its average power output or consumption. Rather than looking for the biggest battery, it’s important to have the right battery concept for your intended use and bike. A bigger battery is always significantly heavier and considerably more expensive, too – it’s one of the most expensive ebike components. The energy density of the battery results from the battery capacity divided by the battery weight – and there are big differences between manufacturers. A compact battery provides around 200 Wh/kg. This is another one of those interesting figures that cannot be taken at face value. In the end, what really counts is the total weight of the bike and the weight distribution. What is the point of a lightweight battery if it’s hard to integrate and doing so adds unnecessary weight to the frame?

Behind the scenes: How we tested the eMTB motors on the trails and in the lab

Over the past 10 years, our E-MOUNTAINBIKE test crew has tested an incredible number of eMTB motors in a wide variety of bikes, accompanying the development of eMTBs from the very beginning. Accordingly, we’ve gained a wealth of experience over the years, which we were able to and did draw from during this eMTB motor comparison. At the time of testing, for example, we had already ridden the Bosch Performance Line CX motor in over 50 different bikes. We had also tested the still very new TQ HPR50 in 7 different bikes by that time. For a different perspective, we handed all the motors on test over to the renowned Velotech test laboratory in Schweinfurt, Germany, to compare our real-world impressions with lab results. As such, our test procedure was divided into a practical component with a large group of test riders from all walks of life and skill levels, and a theoretical component with the motors undergoing a range of lab tests.

Real-world tests – The most crucial part

To get the most comprehensive review of each system in our eMTB motor group test as possible, we compared the motors head-to-head on a predefined,diverse test track, adding our findings to those we’ve already gathered on various test bikes around the world. That way, we were able to accurately identify even minute differences between the eMTB motors. In preparation for this, we ordered 15 sets of MAXXIS tires, in order to rule out the biggest variable in terms of rolling resistance and traction – the tires. All our test bikes were set up the same way. Our test loop included everything an eMTB’s heart desires: gravel paths, steep chutes, a mix of flowing and technical climbs; up steep ridges, through deep ruts, and down steep drops, as well some stretches of tarmac, because dreams aren’t just made of loam! The eMTB motor systems weren’t spared on the descents either. And we didn’t stop at just testing the riding characteristics – we also focused on connectivity, pressing all the buttons, sliding all the sliders and twisting all the dials in the various tuning apps, using the navigation functions, and connecting other accessories. Our aim was to find the optimal settings and exploit the range of each setting to the full. We’ve rarely had so many emotions so close together while conducting our tests, including everything from amazement and enthusiasm to frustration and disappointment.

Lab tests – The nerdy part

After successfully learning all the terms in our glossary, now comes the experimental part with a few lessons in physics: the laboratory tests. We were able to do this at the renowned Velotech testing laboratory in Schweinfurt, Germany. Velotech are a globally recognised and accredited test laboratory in the field of micro mobility, led by Managing Director Marco Brust. Everything can be tested here: from luggage racks according to DIN EN ISO 11243, to our 13 eMTB motors. Their customers include big names from the eMTB industry, such as Bosch and CUBE. We occupied the lab at Velotech for more than three weeks, sparing no expense or effort in pursuit of the ultimate eMTB motor comparison.

To get as much information from the laboratory tests as possible, we measured both the electrical power and the mechanical power curve of each motor, i.e. how much current the motor draws from the battery during operation, and how much of that energy gets to the rear wheel in the form of mechanical power, minus all losses. We did so at different cadences and differing levels of rider input. The collected data allows us to analyse the eMTB motors’ effectiveness at different cadences, including power delivery, torque curve, efficiency, and any software-based restrictions. The result was about 800 data points per motor, filling acres of spreadsheets. We also conducted range tests to collect further data – but there are too many variables that influence the range for us to be able or willing to publish any kind of general ranking for the various motors on test.

An eMTB motor can churn out great values on the test bench but still not perform accordingly on the trail, since even 800 data points can’t represent reality.

Even if everything sounds nice and scientific in a laboratory, reality often looks very different – usually much messier. Therefore, lab values should be used with extreme caution. Ultimately, what matters is what you can feel and what is relevant on the trail. Especially in the case of eMTBs, the factors influencing the ride feel are incredibly complex and vary greatly. This is more noticeable than with cars, where the drivers and their personal traits and characteristics have a much less significant influence on the handling than riders do astride their eMTBs. Effectively, eMTBs are man/machine hybrids, meaning that they always have to be viewed and tested as such. An eMTB motor can churn out great values on the test bench but still not perform accordingly on the trail, since even 800 data points can’t represent reality. After all, we’re not here to play a game of Top Trumps, we’re here to ride bikes! Just because a motor has a little more torque or power doesn’t necessarily mean it’s better, or that it will actually help you negotiate technical climbs more easily, so instead of showboating with impressive graphs that only reflect half the truth, we used the most important and relevant lab results to substantiate our individual reviews within the appropriate context.

The laboratory test procedure

There are different ways to test motors. For us, there was just one option worth considering: to test the motor system as a whole, i.e. in a complete bike, because that is the most realistic. And we were able to do just that at Velotech! Below, we’ve outlined the lab test procedure for all the nerds amongst us.

To prepare for the laboratory tests, we fitted all bikes with control tires running identical pressures, checked the drivetrains, and lubricated the chains. As a result, the energy losses incurred by the rear wheel and drivetrain should be similar. Then the bikes were clamped to a test rig, which looks a little bit like a big, industrial roller trainer, with a roller resting on the rear wheel. The cranks are turned by an external motor, with a continuously variable speed and power. The speed and power of the external motor simulates the rider’s pedalling power and cadence. Drivetrain losses and rolling resistance can be calculated and accounted for by pedalling the bike with the motor switched off at a certain input power and then measuring how much of that power is transferred to the roller. For practical purposes, however, it’s important to understand that the actual mechanical power put out by the rear wheel is what counts.

First, Velotech project manager and physicist Florian Edelmann helped us determine the power and support ratio of the motors. To do so, the pedals were turned at a fixed cadence while simulating a linearly increasing rider input power, allowing us to measure the electrical and mechanical power. We also had the motors in our eMTB motor comparison set to the highest support mode. Why? Only the highest mode is comparable, because this is where the motor performs at its maximum. All other modes differ from manufacturer to manufacturer, or may be tuned by the bike brand, and therefore don’t allow for an accurate comparison. In addition, the various modes offer numerous customisation options, which makes them even less comparable. The power curves we obtained during this test provide information on how much the electrical and mechanical power output increases, what the ratio is between rider input and motor output, how many watts of rider input are needed for the motor to unleash its maximum power, and, finally, at what power it reaches its limit.

As we learnt in the glossary, both the motor’s performance and efficiency are heavily dependent on cadence. So we did a second test run, in which we tested with a specific, constant rider input power and an increasing cadence. For this, we set the rider’s power quite high at 250 watts, because the previous test showed that every motor unleashes its full power by this point – especially the motors with low support ratios. To cover the complete spectrum for our eMTB motor comparison, we started with a low cadence of 20 RPM and then gradually raised it to a maximum of 120, both of which are extremes at which hardly anyone pedals in reality. While doing so, we again measured the electrical and mechanical power. The results show how much the respective performance depends on the cadence. In other words, at which cadence the motor unleashes its maximum power, is most efficient, and at which cadence the power starts tapering off. In addition, it allowed us to detect the influence of the software: like whether the manufacturer even wants the motor to generate maximum power at a comfortable cadence or whether full power is reserved for those who are willing to put in the effort themselves. We repeated this test with a rider input power of 150 watts, which corresponds to the average power of a relatively fit rider. This test allowed us to draw various conclusions, such as whether an average rider can even manage to call up the motor’s maximum power (without pulling a muscle in the process), and whether riders would perhaps get the same performance from a smaller, less powerful motor without carrying the added weight of full-power models? Finally, which motor provides the most assistance if you want to take it easy yourself?

Details and features: What to look for on an eMTB motor

We already know that choosing the right eMTB system is about far more than the motor’s performance specs and battery capacity. Rather, the overall concept of the eMTB and motor system must suit your intended use and requirements. Nevertheless, there are numerous details and features on the various system components that you should look for.

Which eMTB displays and remotes are right for you?

Just as the grips and pedals serve as the contact points between the rider and the bike, the remote and display are the interface between the rider and the motor system. Depending on the manufacturer, you’ve got a wide range of options: from off-the-shelf products supplied by motor manufacturers, to in-house solutions from bike brands, and third-party products, such as those from system integrators FIT. Top dogs Bosch now offer a whole range of displays and remotes.

The eMTB motor remotes – Push the button

A remote is either your thumb’s best friend or greatest enemy. How friendly or antagonistic the relationship between your thumb and the remote turns out to be depends largely on your subjective needs and expectations. The range of remotes that we’ve fondled is correspondingly wide: including everything from clunky remotes with enough buttons to control a space shuttle, to incredibly minimalistic little levers.

While the minimalist approach usually offers simple operation and an unobtrusive look, extensive remotes usually provide more functions. In the latter case, there’s often just one function assigned per button, and menu items on the display can usually be accessed more directly. They also stand out more on the handlebars and can interfere with the brake and dropper levers, depending on the design. Ergonomics also play a role, because what good is the best remote if you can’t reach it, or only reach it by contorting your hand? Particularly big remotes, like the Bosch LED Remote and the FIT Basic Remote, stick out further from the handlebars than the minimalist TQ and FAZUA remotes, for example. As a result, you’ll have to lift your thumb further away from the grip and press the buttons at an awkward angle, which can be rather uncomfortable. While touring riders have fewer problems with this, it’s especially uncomfortable to remove your thumb further from the grip than absolutely necessary when you’re on the trail – whether you’re riding up or downhill. Remotes with lots of buttons also increase the chances of hitting the wrong button when riding on bumpy terrain, which is a problem you won’t have with small remotes that have just two or three buttons.

The haptics and feedback of the buttons also differ greatly between the different models and brands. While you can never be quite sure whether you’ve actually pressed the buttons on the Yamaha Remote because they have almost zero play, the FIT Basic Remote even provides vibration feedback. In general, a well-defined engagement point with a noticeable amount of smooth play before it, like you get from the Shimano EM800-L remote, feels most natural. Systems that are capable of emitting sound, like that of Specialized, provide additional feedback on the respective action.

The displays of eMTB motors – A minimalist LED or a flat screen TV?

The same applies to displays as to remotes: they’re available in abundance. Large colour displays, small colour displays, integrated displays in the remote, LEDs… You get the drift. Depending on the manufacturer, however, the different variants can be better or worse. TQ manage to provide all the necessary information via a minimalist black and white display in the top tube, whereas Yamaha provide just two rows of LED lights in a chunky block on the handlebar.

With the displays, you must ask yourself how much information you need while riding and how much information you can do without for the sake of a cleaner look and more intuitive operation. Trail-shredders that hang out mainly in their local woods will be fine with a minimalist combination of a small remote and a type of battery level indicator, like the Bosch System Controller or the FAZUA LED display. If, on the other hand, you require navigation on your eMTB and love having access to a wide variety of riding data on the go, you’re better off using a large, feature-rich display. But beware, displays can be a distraction while riding! And besides the type of display, its position is crucial, too. A display that’s positioned in front of the stem remains easily visible while riding, albeit exposed in the event of a crash, and it makes your bike look like a unicorn. The Brose display integrated into the remote ensures one of the cleaner looks in our eMTB motor comparison. One of its drawbacks is that it interferes with the brake lever and, above all, the system start button is positioned between the display and the brake lever, which makes it finicky to operate. For trail riders, integrated displays in the top tube are the most elegant solution, as is standard with TQ, FAZUA, Specialized and DJI.

Charging options for smartphones and other gadgets aboard eMTBs

Whether it’s a smartphone or GPS bike computer, both tend to run out of battery just when you need them most. All the better then that many eMTB motor systems offer integrated charging options, so you can charge your devices while riding. However, you shouldn’t completely rely on this either, because often the charging power is just enough to prevent your smartphone battery from dying while you’re using it to navigate. So, heading out the door with your smartphone battery at just 5% won’t get you very far even with a charging option on your ebike. The position of the charging port plays a major role here, too. You want it close to the head tube, in which case a short cable will suffice to charge your Garmin or smartphone while attached to the stem or handlebar. FAZUA have cleverly integrated a USB-C charging port under the LED display, where it’s within easy reach but well hidden and protected from the elements.

E-mountainbike motor apps – Frustration or joy?

All motors in our eMTB motor comparison have an app, which provides a useful interface with the system. Since these offer a wide variety of approaches and solutions, the question is: what should a good app be capable of? First, it must establish a connection between your smartphone and the eMTB system quickly and easily. Nothing is more annoying than having to jump through hoops or wait forever for the app and your bike to establish a connection. Bike computers or watches can also serve as an interface to the eMTB system, giving you access to additional information – particularly if you’re using a very minimalist display. Moreover, a good app should always let you tune the motor characteristics and customise the support modes. But more on this later.
Over-the-air software updates are a cool feature to keep your eMTB up to date. Systems that don’t yet have this capability can only be updated by plugging the bike into your laptop or taking it to a dealer, which is a hassle. All these functions, if properly implemented, already make a good app, providing everything you need. It’s also important that it takes just ONE app, so that you don’t have to switch between several apps for different functions or install other apps or add-ons to establish a connection.

In addition to these basic functions of a good app, some manufacturers offer additional features that, if implemented well, can expand the range of functions significantly. Navigation that includes an estimate of the range based on the route, its elevation profile, and the motor’s energy consumption can be immensely helpful when planning your route. At best, these work in combination with turn by turn instructions on the display. Being able to link it with platforms like Komoot and Strava is a plus, allowing you to directly synchronise your routes and ride data. Fun stats can also be a hit with your buddies while sipping on a well-deserved post-ride brew. For example, Specialized allow you to track your jump stats to see how much time you spent in the air during a ride. That way you can quickly put an end to the discussion about who collected the most airtime. The Bosch eBike Lock function and the Specialized System Lock provide added peace of mind in day-to-day life when leaving your bike parked outside or stopping for refreshments after a long day in the saddle. These functions let you disable the motor in the app, so thieves can’t just ride away with your bike in Turbo mode. However, it’s only the motor that’s disabled, so the eMTB can still be ridden like an analogue bike. Bosch go one step further with the ConnectModule: it allows you to track the location of your bike via the app, and can emit an alarm when the bike gets moved. However, you also need a paid subscription to unlock the function in the Bosch eBike Flow app. DJI’s comprehensive app allows you to customise several parameters of the riding modes, such as torque, the duration of the sustained assistance, pedal sensitivity and start-off power, and to display statistics from your tracked rides. The implemented GPS tracking function also lets you track your bike and customise the look of your touch display with countless functions. And all this in a user-friendly interface. However, this is just the tip of the iceberg, and DJI offer significantly more features than the competition with their app.

Different riding modes and customizability of the eMTB motors

Linear or dynamic e-mountainbike support modes?

The motor manufacturers in this test offer three to five different support modes as standard. In principle, the support modes can be divided into two categories, according to the type of support: dynamic and linear. Dynamic support modes adapt to the riding situation, meaning that the motor adjusts its support depending on the incline, cadence, or force applied to the pedals. Dynamic support modes provide a natural ride feel on level ground, where little support is needed, while letting the motor kick into high gear when you need it most, like on a steep, technical climb. By now, most high-quality motor systems come with one or more dynamic modes, with the most well-known probably being Bosch’s E-MTB mode. Linear modes, on the other hand, do not adapt the eMTB motor’s output according to the input or riding situation. Thus, they offer a fixed support ratio at which the support increases linearly with increased input.

Customizability of the ebike motor support modes

Most eMTB motor manufacturers allow you to customise the various support modes via an app. The adjustability varies greatly between the different motor systems. Some manufacturers, like Brose, offer just one dial per support mode, allowing you to adjust the intensity of each mode. With the Micro Adjust function, Specialized let you do this directly via the remote, even while riding. Other manufacturers take it a step further still. With Bosch, the support and dynamics of all modes can be adjusted from -5 to +5 in the eBike Flow app. In other words, it’s not just the intensity of the support that can be adjusted, but also the way it kicks in. In addition, you can set the maximum speed up to which a mode offers support, and the maximum torque. Specialized follow a similar path, allowing you to adjust four parameters in every support mode. The manufacturers in our eMTB motor comparison test also showed differences in the extent to which the modes can be adjusted. Bosch have a predefined framework within which adjustments can be made. Brose, on the other hand, let you drag the adjuster from 0 to 100 in any mode, so you can turn Eco mode into Turbo mode and vice versa. The FAZUA system is similarly unrestricted, even allowing you to configure entirely new personalised modes. Shimano take it to a whole other level with theirFine Tune mode, which gives you the option of configuring up to 15 individual support modes. It’s not just in their range of functions that the manufacturers differ, but also in clarity and user-friendliness. Regarding custom support modes and fine tuning, it’s up to you to decide how far you want to dive down this rabbit hole, or whether you’d be happy with the existing modes as they are and prefer to spend your time on the trails instead of fiddling with dials on a screen.

E-mountainbike batteries – An overview of the different battery concepts

Basically, the battery concepts of manufacturers can be categorised as monolithic or modular. The classic configuration is monolithic, where you’ve got one battery integrated on the bike, serving as your only power source. Most of the integrated batteries in the down tubes are removable, which offers advantages when transporting the eMTB, and allows you to take the battery indoors for charging. However, there are big differences in the battery covers and locking mechanisms used. Other batteries are permanently integrated, meaning they can’t be removed. With a modular system, the battery capacity can be expanded. This is done with range extenders – external batteries that attach externally to the frame and plug into the charging port. Range extenders vary in size from manufacturer to manufacturer, but they always function as an extension of the main battery. They usually attach to the bottle cage or a specially designed bracket, and connect to the main battery. The advantage of a modular system is that you can expand the battery capacity as needed. If you typically ride shorter routes and get along well with a smaller battery, but don’t want to miss out on longer rides at the weekend, you can simply up the capacity with a range extender and off you go. As a result, you don’t have to carry around unnecessary battery capacity and therefore weight on your post-work jaunts. In our eMTB motor comparison, the minimal-assist motors from TQ, Specialized, and Bosch all have the option of a range extender, but so do the full-power systems from GIANT and Pinion. In theory, some motors such as the Specialized SL 1.2 and the Bosch SX, can be powered solely by a range extender, without the main battery.

E-mountainbike battery durability – Service life, charging cycles, and storage

Manufacturers merely provide indications of the lifespan of eMTB batteries. Each battery has a specified number of charging cycles after which a certain % of residual capacity remains usable. That said, this information only serves as a rough guideline, and it’s difficult to prove or grasp in realistic terms. However, as a general rule of thumb, it can be said that bigger batteries should have a longer service life. On the one hand, this is simply because larger batteries don’t need to be charged as often – fewer charging cycles mean that the cell chemistry of the batteries is less affected. On the other hand, the bigger capacity allows you to keep the state of charge ranging between 30% and 80%, which is gentler on the battery. That said, no eMTB battery is exempt from wear and tear, unfortunately. Depending on the manufacturer and battery, the number of charging cycles that a battery will put up with varies. In most cases, however, you can expect to get between 500 and 1,000 charging cycles. If you ride your eMTB three times a week, fully draining and recharging the battery every time – that is, one full charging cycle per ride – the battery’s service life is just over 3 years, assuming the worst-case scenario of 500 charging cycles. However, even if this were the case, most batteries still have a decent amount of usable capacity remaining. In addition, the battery service life can be prolonged with the appropriate care: if you only recharge it halfway, you only use half a charging cycle. Furthermore, the storage of your battery also determines the speed at which it deteriorates. E-mountainbike batteries don’t like getting very hot or cold, with the ideal temperature ranging between 10°C and 20°C, so it is best not to store the battery in the garden shed when you’ve got frost or very high temperatures. If you’re not going to use your eMTB for a long time, like in the winter, make sure that the battery level doesn’t fall below 30%. Batteries don’t like being stored almost empty. While this is good general advice, you should always try to follow the manufacturer’s recommendations on storage and charging of your particular battery.

Market maturity and service network of eMTB motors

As described at the beginning, the development speed of eMTBs and especially eMTB motors is incredibly high. Unfortunately, this also results in products being introduced to the market prematurely, leaving customers to contend with all kinds of teething issues. We also got a taste of that in our big eMTB group test. Above all, we struggled with various issues still plaguing the new minimal-assist eMTB motor systems. In particular, FAZUA’s software has had various bugs since its launch in 2022. So, buying a newly launched eMTB motor can come with certain risks. And some of these problems are actually structural in nature, which, though they can be mitigated to an extent, can rarely be remedied completely. For example, the Brose Drive S Mag long had problems with the internal belt. Fortunately, the internals of the Brose motor have been slightly modified since that first faulty generation and the software has been improved, too, so the technical issues have been largely dealt with. Incidentally, the newly introduced Brose Drive³ Peak dispenses with the belt.

With the above in mind, it’s all the more important to be able to rely on a large and competent service and dealer network. After all, what good is the latest eMTB motor system if you run into a technical issue while on holiday but the closest service partner is on another continent? The likes of Bosch and Shimano have a very extensive network of dealers and service partners. In general, the bigger and more widely distributed a motor brand is, the better the chances of getting help at home or on holiday in the event of a defect.

Conclusions: high-performance maths to find the right bike

In the single motor reviews, you’ll find all relevant information and detailed insights into each motor system, with all its strengths, weaknesses, and potential. Although the overall design of a bike is what really matters, it’s always worth taking a closer look at all the motors currently available on the market to avoid unpleasant surprises and get the most value for your money! After all, there’s a second, highly mathematical equation to consider: great bike + bad motor = bad bike! In this context, “bad” doesn’t necessarily refer to motor performance; it can also refer to anything that can get you stranded in the woods, like an unreliable system, vulnerable components, or poor service and spare parts availability in your country. So, make sure to stay well-informed and make the right purchasing decision. We’ve got your back and are committed to providing you with honest information and essential background insights!

Der Beitrag Our big eMTB motor comparison – 15 eMTB motors on test erschien zuerst auf E-MOUNTAINBIKE Magazine.

As the contact points of a bike, the handlebars, saddle, and pedals of a bike have to fit like a glove – one you’d be happy to wear all day. Just as important as the pedals are the shoes you wear to complement them. After all, you wouldn’t bomb down a trail in flip-flops! Two Swiss founders came to the same conclusion, and in 2007, they launched Suplest to take cycling shoes to the next level. Originally focusing on road shoes, Suplest now also manufacture mountain bike shoes and lifestyle sneakers.

“Check out my new shoes!” hollers tester Manne while walking through the front door with a big grin on his face, showing off his brand-new Suplest Flatpedal MTB shoes. And he’s not wrong – the 2022 Flatpedal Sport certainly catches the eye. With its understated design, the Suplest Flatpedal Sport features black and grey microfiber with synthetic leather sections and red accents on the eyelets and the pull loop on the tongue.

The Suplest Flatpedal Sport shoes are available in two colours, black and yellow-brown, which both retail at around €130. One of the first things you’ll notice is the lacing system – or rather, you won’t notice it at all, as it’s hidden under a neoprene cover. The cover is there to tuck the laces away, preventing them from catching in the drivetrain, which has caused many crashes in the past. The Flatpedal Sport features the BEARPAW 5 sole made from SUPtraction rubber, which is also designed in Switzerland. Together with the knobby tread, it promises superb grip both on the pedal pins and on the ground. So, how did the shoes perform in our test?

On the trail and in the office – Suplest Flatpedal Sport MTB shoes on test

After Manne showed off his new shoes in the office, we couldn’t wait to see how they performed on the trail. The Suplest MTB shoes are easy to slip on and fit snugly right from the start – even before tightening the laces. The front of the shoe is reinforced with a stiff rubber toe cap, and there’s excellent padding around the ankle, ensuring the shoes fit securely without being too tight. Even after a full day in the office, Manne had no pressure points, nor did he after several consecutive days of long eMTB tours in the Dolomites.

The roomy toe box makes these MTB shoes ideal for riders with wide feet. Plus, the breathable material ensures your feet don’t overheat – unless it’s 35°C outside, in which case, you’re going to sweat regardless of your choice of footwear!

On the pedals, the SUPtraction rubber sole of the Flatpedal Sport provides a solid connection with the pedal pins. The grip is so strong that you need to consciously lift your foot to adjust your position – just as it should be. The stiff sole ensures excellent power transfer to the pedals while remaining flexible enough for comfortable walking. This means you don’t feel like you’re clomping around in ski boots on the way to a scenic viewpoint. And the knobby tread doesn’t act as a dirt magnet, so you don’t need to swap your shoes when you get to the office after your commute. And the comfortable sole also making those five daily trips to the coffee machine no problem at all in these shoes.

Manne’s tip: buy the shoes a size larger than usual – feet tend to swell by the evening!

Conclusion about the Suplest Faltpedal Sport

The Suplest Flatpedal Sport MTB shoes impressed us above all with their BEARPAW 5 sole, which offers great grip both on the pedals and on the ground. We’re pretty fond of the overall comfort feeling too, even when just walking around the office. Highlights include the snug fit, reinforced toe cap and ankle protection, and breathable materials. The shoes remain comfortable, even on longer rides. For €129,99, you’ll get a solid pair of MTB shoes that can handle the trail while still looking good for everyday use.

Tops

• Excellent grip on and off the pedals thanks to the sole
• Comfortable fit
• Practical neoprene cover for the laces

Flops

• None

For more information, visit suplest.com.

Der Beitrag Suplest Flatpedal Sport MTB shoes on test – Grip and comfort Included? erschien zuerst auf E-MOUNTAINBIKE Magazine.

Osram – a name most of us associate with domestic light bulbs. However, the company has now turned its attention to the bicycle market. The result are three bike light sets, each consisting of a front and rear light. We tested both the priciest RACE 100 SET variant, which offers a powerful 100 lux and retails at € 49,99 and the cheapest RACE 50 model, which generates 50 lux and costs € 24,99. In between, there’s also the RACE 80, which costs € 34.99 and produces 80 lux.

Both of the models we tested can be charged via a USB-C charging port, and are delivered with a charging cable. However, Osram don’t include the power adapter, so you’ll have to either find one or borrow one from a friend The RACE 50 SET and RACE 100 SET both attach to the handlebars and seat tube with a rubber band – or you can secure them to a pannier rack too. Setup for both front and rear lights is almost identical, except that the front light mount can rotate 360°, while the rear light only tilts. When tilting or rotating, a fine ratchet system provides clicking feedback. A clear advantage is that you can attach and remove the light unit from the rubber band mount without having to loosen the band each time.

Both headlights have three brightness levels, which can be controlled by the power button. Both also feature two light strips on the sides of the housing – so you’re visible from the side too! At the top of the housing, there’s an LED indicator showing the battery status – 13 hours, according to the manufacturer. However, only the more expensive RACE 100 version displays the brightness level at the top alongside the battery charge status – nice! The build quality of the bike lights, which consist of an aluminium heat sink, a robust plastic housing, and a transparent polycarbonate lens designed for maximum durability, is impressive.

The two lights differ not only in price but also in the features. The RACE 100 bike light comes with a continuous light mode and an automatic brightness sensor – meaning it turns on by itself. There’s also a brake light function and 50 more lux on the front light. However, both models we tested are splash-proof with an IP44 rating.

What is lux, anyway?

Lux is the unit used to measure the brightness of a bike light. It measures the illuminance of the headlight at the centre of the light beam, perpendicular to the road surface at a distance of 10 metres. Simply put, lux indicates the brightness of the light at its brightest point. However, it’s important to note that lux doesn’t tell you anything about the total light output (measured in lumens) or the width of the beam (beam angle). Lux doesn’t reveal how far the beam reaches to the sides. There are also clear regulations for road traffic: in Germany, a bike light must have at least 10 lux to avoid trouble with the law. If you’re a mountain biker or an outdoor enthusiast riding off-road, there are no limits to the lux rating – except for your bike light’s battery life. That’s because the higher the lux, the more energy the light requires.

That’s everything about light intensity for now.

Osram bike light on review

Although you shouldn’t be riding trails at night – mainly for the love for wildlife and another small, yet significant factor – not being able to see anything – we ventured into the darkness to see whether the Osram RACE 50 bike light could brighten up the trail. First off: Osram don’t recommend the RACE 50 for trail use; only the RACE 100 is listed specifically for “off-road riding.” But we couldn’t resist and took both along for our night ride.

Osram RACE 50: Thanks to the rubber straps, it can be attached to the handlebars and seat tube in no time. On forest tracks and in road traffic, the light reliably illuminates the path ahead, which makes it a very practical companion. In the highest setting, the headlight ensures good visibility, allowing you to comfortably ride home at 25 km/h. We only used the other two brightness levels when the battery was running low. However, on the trail, the light is unfortunately ineffective: the narrow beam makes it more of a guessing game rather than showing you clearly where you’re going – dangerous! This effect is amplified by the low brightness and the handlebar mount. While the handlebar always points in the direction you’re riding, it doesn’t necessarily point where you’re looking. So the light doesn’t move with your head like a helmet-mounted light does. Furthermore, when riding on rough terrain, vibrations are transferred directly to the light. In short, don’t use the RACE 50 on trails – it’s better suited for the ride home after an evening spin on your local trails, when it gets dark earlier in the autumn. For that, the RACE 50 is a decent choice. The tail light, which mounts just as easily to the seat tube, is less bulky but still reasonably bright, ensuring good visibility in traffic. Even in the busiest urban environments, we felt safe.

Osram RACE 100: the RACE 100 is just as easy to mount as its little sibling and looks identical. In heavy urban traffic and on forest tracks leading to trailheads, the RACE 100 is a solid option. However, it’s still not suitable for trail riding: while the light is brighter, the beam is still too narrow to spot obstacles in time, and the handlebar mount limits it further. But as an addition to a trail-riding-specific helmet light, it’s quite useful. The automatic brightness detector, which switches between three levels, seemed unnecessary to us. Yes, it saves battery, but when it’s dark, we want to see as much as possible, so we ended up using the brightest setting most of the time. We did appreciate the brake light function – it works reliably and was a nice feature in road traffic. The battery life of the headlight in automatic mode was moderate, lasting around 5 hours in our tests, though it obviously depends on the individual lighting conditions. Temperature also plays a role in battery performance.

Thanks to the IP44 rating, both bike lights can easily withstand rain and mud – though with mud, you should wipe them off occasionally, as it can obscure the light.

The mounts on both lights are stable, but we noticed an annoying squeaking sound on gravel paths and with heavier vibrations, even with different handlebar materials. While this is no big deal, it can be quite irritating on longer rides. Additionally, we missed having a continuous flashing mode on both lights, which could help attract more attention on long road rides (though, of course, it’s not compliant with German road regulations).

Conclusions about the Osram RACE 50/100 bike light

Both lights are solid choices for use on roads and forest tracks. But once you hit the trails, they clearly reach their limits: the beam is too narrow, and too much vibration makes the light unstable. However, for the ride home after an evening spin or as an everyday light for commuting, they work well. But if you’re serious about riding trails, you’re better off looking for a brighter light with a wider beam, and, possibly, a helmet mount.

Tops

• Easy to mount
• Good for commuting
• Suitable for forest tracks and road traffic

Flops

• Squeaky rubber straps
• Not suitable for trails

More information can be found at Osram.com

Der Beitrag Let there be light: can the Osram LEDsBIKE RACE 100 SET & RACE 50 bring some light into darkness? erschien zuerst auf E-MOUNTAINBIKE Magazine.

Daisies, dandelions, and nettles – plants from childhood that everyone remembers. Sometimes they were carefully picked apart, other times mixed with dirt and water into a smelly potion. The curious ones might have cautiously tasted them, while others felt the sting on bare skin after brushing against nettles. What do all these plants have in common? They’re part of the ubiquitous yet invisible green background to our lives, lining our local paths and trails, yet fading into the background beneath our feet. Or worse still, they’re merely weeds – unwelcome wild intruders into our carefully manicured flowerbeds and vegetable patches. Yet they belong to a magical circle of plants, packed with vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and myriad other health benefits: we’re talking about wild herbs.

Superfoods are everywhere these days, flown in from who knows where: goji berries from Mongolia packed with antioxidants, chia seeds from China rich in omega-3s are a must in every muesli, and mineral-rich quinoa salads from Chile are found in every supermarket. Great for our insides, but not so great for the environment. Meanwhile, we have our own superfoods right here, sometimes even in our own gardens or in the green spaces just outside our doors! The problem? We have no clue.

Sure, no one who enjoys spending time in nature is completely clueless. “Look what I brought back!” is something you hear often from May onwards, after a morning run or MTB ride through the woods. Most of the time, it’s a few leaves of wild garlic or woodruff poking out of a jersey pocket, giving off a fragrant scent. But let’s be honest: how many of us can really tell the difference between lady’s mantle and coltsfoot, never mind their nutritional properties? Mistaking wild herbs can have deadly consequences too. That’s when we, the casual foragers, inevitably need to call in the experts. Fortunately, there are people who’ve made wild herbs their speciality and are eager to pass on their knowledge to us wilderness-ignorant city folk. Experts like wilderness educator Sandra, who is taking us on a leisurely ride through the fields, woods and meadows that wrap around the outskirts of Stuttgart, to show us all the natural treasures hiding in plain sight in our local area.

Generation 4 – The wild herb expert

Is she a modern-day herbal witch? Sandra doesn’t see herself that way. Her side business, where she leads wild herb walks, doesn’t need a fancy title. What she connects with it is more of a feeling: an appreciation and fascination for nature’s treasures – an interest which has been passed down through generations in her family. Her great grandmother was even lovingly called “the herbal witch.” Generations of knowledge about wild herbs and their use as natural home remedies: for Sandra, as part of the new generation, it’s a true treasure, one she expands with her passion for plants and the environment.

Why does Sandra share her knowledge of wild herbs? For the wilderness educator, it’s all about creating awareness of the world around us. “Only when I know something can I truly appreciate it. When I build a relationship with the things out there, engage with plants, and recognize their potential, I become more mindful of them and better equipped to protect the entire ecosystem.” Sounds logical and meaningful – we want that too! So, what do we need to do? Sandra became a wild herb expert by completing further training as a wilderness educator. But a lot of it was also self-taught: going out, experimenting, using field guides and good apps. She occasionally shares her experiences from nature walks and her discoveries on her Instagram account, wildflowersandherbs. You’ll also find mini plant profiles and dates for her herb walks there.

Wild herbs à la surprise

Tuesday afternoon, late August. We’re ready to explore nature’s treasures for ourselves. With ebikes, we set off on a motorised wild herb hike through the enchanted Siebenmühlental, on the outskirts of Stuttgart. It’s beautiful. Our eyes wander expectantly over forests, meadows, and tractors with mower attachments… Wait a minute: mower attachments? Damn, are we too late? A closer look reveals most of the meadows are freshly mowed, most of the herbs have bloomed, and the leaves are no longer young and tender. Great. Should we call it off?

Sandra isn’t bothered at all: “Every season shows a different side of a plant. Now, in late summer, we may not find many young plants, and those bearing fruit have already finished blooming, but there’s still plenty to harvest.” Lead us to some of your personal favourites, Sandra. We hop back on the bikes and continue through late-summer forests and meadows, scented with mushrooms and freshly cut grass, until Sandra finds a spot where we can park the bikes: a large, green meadow in a clearing. Tons of weeds sprout everywhere, lining the banks of a nearby stream. Pretty unspectacular. Are we really going to find any amazing plants here? But Sandra immediately spots a wild herb she loves so much that she has it tattooed on her: yarrow. It blooms in every second meadow until early fall. We bet most of you didn’t know that it’s not just something to admire – you can also harvest and eat it! And that since ancient times, it’s been known as a special healing herb for women, with properties that help reduce bleeding and heal inflammation?

“It’s especially valuable for children to learn that the nettle doesn’t just sting, but also has amazing benefits.”

Ouch! While searching for more herbs in the banks of the stream, we literally sit in the nettles. Those annoying things – best to trample them down, right? No way! To our surprise, Sandra has so many good things to say about this prickly wild herb that we quickly change our minds. Sure, we knew that nettle manure makes an excellent fertiliser for the garden, and we’ve seen it in tea blends. But we never really trusted nettles. Yet, they’re one of the few plants that truly deserve the title of superfood. Sandra is impressed by their abilities: “Nettles are incredibly tough. They have amazing defence mechanisms like stinging hairs, and they’re packed with minerals that have helped them survive for millions of years. And we humans can benefit from these defences too.” Sandra is like a walking herb encyclopaedia, but way more exciting than any boring old book.

We continue on our ebikes through the Valley of Seven Mills until we reach the next spot, where Sandra expects to find her third favourite herb. Sure enough, she finds what she’s looking for as we stop beside a little patch of unassuming low vegetation – ground ivy. We’ve never heard of it. “Yes,” Sandra confirms, “this wild medicinal herb is subtle, and not everyone knows it. But ground ivy was used extensively in ancient and medieval folk medicine to treat respiratory issues, digestive problems, and to heal wounds.” Hildegard of Bingen, the renowned herbal expert who greatly inspires Sandra, was one of the first to document ground ivy’s healing properties. It’s recommended wherever pus and mucus are involved.

After just three wild herbs with Sandra, we’re delighted by what surrounds us when we wander through the woods. But how do we find our own favourite herb? Sandra suggests: “Just head out into nature and take a mindful look around. It’s important to find your own connection: What feels good to you? Which plant catches your eye? At first, you might not even know why. Maybe it’s the way it looks, or perhaps its scent draws you in. The more you explore, the more you might discover why it’s so beneficial for you.” Or maybe you won’t – and maybe it doesn’t even matter to know the reasons.

We pack our healing plants into a tin we brought in our backpacks. If you’re gathering wild herbs on foot, not with an e-bike, it’s best to use a basket. No, we’re not going back to fairy tales. A basket gives any little critters on your plants the opportunity to crawl out before you take them home.

But is this all just useless trivia?

A glimpse into Sandra’s favourite herbs already shows: wild herbs are as fascinating as they are diverse. Our ancestors knew this well. Midwives were among the first in Europe to truly recognize their medicinal value, using them in women’s health. Soon, this knowledge expanded into general medicine. But these aren’t the only areas where wild herbs shine.

Quick overview: What wild herbs are good for

• Medicine: Today, wild herbs are used in the pharmaceutical industry to create herbal medicines and supplements. But we can also make our own wild herb tinctures and salves, using echinacea compresses or calendula ointment to treat injuries. It benefits the body and saves money!
• Cuisine: Whether in smoothies, fresh or dried as tea, to flavour water, or as an addition to salads and sauces, or even in a wild herb butter, freshly picked herbs add a healthy boost to our diet.

• Cosmetics: Wild herbs are also used in natural skincare products like creams, shampoos, and salves with anti-inflammatory or soothing effects on the skin. You can easily make these yourself – there are plenty of guides online.
• Household use: Nettle manure is used as a garden fertiliser, while yarrow can be processed into a natural pesticide. Thyme and lavender are popular for decoration and as natural air fresheners, and herbs with essential oils are perfect for incense.

Wild herbs right outside your door – 3 beginner plants

If you’re already eager to take advantage of these green all-rounders nearby, start with these easily recognizable wild herbs:

1. Dandelion
Everyone knows it! But probably not its healing properties. Dandelion is rich in vitamin A, vitamin C, iron, and potassium. It’s also packed with fibre, and has diuretic properties. Fun fact: In Swabia, the dandelion is called “Bettseicher” (‘bed-wetter’) because it was once believed that eating it could cause nighttime accidents. But back to the dry facts: The bitter compounds in dandelion can help relieve digestive issues like bloating. Almost every part of this wild herb is edible – leaves, flowers, and even roots. Dandelion leaves are great in salads, smoothies, or as a side vegetable, and the roasted, ground roots were brewed as a coffee substitute during times of scarcity, something which is now back in vogue among self-sufficiency enthusiasts! Okay, this might not cut it for real coffee connoisseurs, but we have a special treat for you: our sister magazine DOWNTOWN is dedicating a special edition to coffee, with a growing number of stories on the black gold. Be sure to check it out!

2. Plantains
These healing plants can be found in any semi-wild garden or meadow. The most common varieties are narrowleaf plantain and broadleaf plantain. Both are often used as home remedies: narrowleaf plantain’s mucilaginous compounds help soothe sore throats and loosen mucus during a cold. As for broadleaf plantain, you can recognize it by its wider leaves, as the name suggests. Both serve as a first-aid plant, found almost anywhere in nature. Got a bee sting at the playground, or a blister while hiking? The juice from crushed leaves has anti-inflammatory and soothing effects. Sandra even tosses them into salads and soups.

3. Clover
Poor clover is often cursed as a weed in gardens, but despite its humble appearance, it has been a valued medicinal herb since the Middle Ages. Its phytoestrogens act as natural hormone regulators and are especially used by women during menopause to alleviate symptoms like hot flushes. In natural medicine, red clover is mainly used to support the immune system, and as an anti-inflammatory treatment for skin problems. Adding it to your smoothie or as a decorative touch in a salad is a great choice, as it’s rich in vitamins (A, B, C, K) and minerals like calcium, magnesium, and potassium. Red clover also makes a beautiful garnish for bread with wild herb butter or infused water.

No risk, no reward? – Proceed with caution!

Disclaimer: It cannot be stressed enough: Some popular wild herbs can easily be mistaken, with potentially deadly consequences. Therefore, you must be absolutely certain before harvesting them. We assume no liability for any health issues that may arise after reading this article.

Wild herb hiking for inner balance

Knowing your wild herbs definitely gives you a boost in everyday life, Sandra is sure of that. When work and routine keep her away from wild herbs for too long, she feels more tired and dissatisfied. She compares it to when you take a break from sports and fall into a slump. Sandra isn’t quite sure what it is – maybe it’s the minerals, or the time she dedicates to her passion – but when the whole package is missing, she feels it. And we notice it too on this wild herb tour. With our newfound knowledge, we realise how much nature can captivate us. Sandra’s enthusiasm for the world of green power plants is contagious, making our little expedition a unique highlight of the week. Naturally, we plan to start using this underrated greenery whenever we can, and we’re confident that regularly incorporating local wild herbs into our weekly meals (even starting with “every now and then” is great) will probably make us healthier and more resilient against the stress that life throws our way, and a little happier too.

“Google Lens says it’s fine!” – Staying safe while foraging for wild herbs

Enough talk. If you’re ready to dive into the world of wild herbs, we’ve got a few final useful tips from the herb expert herself, like how to protect yourself from death by the wrong Google Lens results

Dos

Don’ts

1. Don’t rely solely on identification apps – they’re not perfect. With Flora Incognita, the probability that your photographed plant matches the identified wild herb is shown in percentages. And beware – Google Lens can also make mistakes!
2. Minimise harm to the plant when harvesting: Avoid using dull or metallic knives; a ceramic knife is best, as a clean cut helps the plant heal better.
3. Harvest in moderation, taking only what you can process.
4. Not everyone tolerates plants like narrowleaf plantain or hazel catkins. If you’re unsure, don’t consume the plant right away. Do a sensitivity test: rub it on your forearm, and your skin will soon let you know if you’re allergic or not.

Superfoods from overseas might be healthy, and pharmacies have their place. But how cool is it to have your own superfoods right at your doorstep and be able to mix up your own healing salve? Just because something is freely available doesn’t make it any less valuable: in fact, we think it’s even more so. By engaging more mindfully with our surroundings, it’s amazing what we can find not far from our doorsteps.

If you want to learn more about wild herbs or join a wild herb walk, check out Sandra’s Instagram page: wildflowersandherbs.

Der Beitrag Wild herbs: Superfood right at your doorstep erschien zuerst auf E-MOUNTAINBIKE Magazine.

This review forms part of our big ebike motor comparison test. Here you’ll find an overview of all 15 motors in review, along with lots of exciting background information, and helpful buying advice for your next purchase!

With its Avinox motor system, chinese drone giant DJI caused a major stir at Eurobike 2024. Since then, it has become the number one topic of conversation in the cycling industry. DJI bring extensive expertise in developing small, powerful electric motors, along with battery, connectivity, and app development, creating the ideal conditions to enter the e-mountain bike segment. And they’ve done just that: the new DJI Avinox motor boasts up to 120 Nm of torque and 1,000 watts peak power, single-handedly outshining the competition – at least on paper. Alongside the motor system, which includes a mid-drive motor, batteries, remotes, touch display, and an app, DJI also launched their own bike brand, AMFLOW. They introduced a high-performance e-mountain bike in two different configurations, both of which – so far exclusively – rely on the DJI Avinox motor system and feature 160/150 mm of suspension travel (front/rear). We’ve already tested the AMFLOW PL Carbon Pro for you.

DJI Avinox in detail – the connectivity marvel?

The core of the DJI Avinox motor system is its compact mid-drive motor, which delivers up to 120 Nm of torque and 1,000 watts of peak power in Boost mode. In normal mode, it still churns out 105 Nm and 850 watts. Despite having plenty of power, it’s compact and lightweight, tipping the scales at just 2.52 kg, which makes it several hundred grams lighter and slightly smaller than its key competitors. For example, the new Bosch Performance Line CX motor weighs 2.8 kg. The DJI motor draws its power from either a 600 Wh or 800-Wh battery, both of which were developed in-house. The 600 Wh version weighs 2.9 kg, while the 800 Wh battery comes in at a lightweight 3.7 kg, offering a relatively high energy density of 216 Wh/kg compared to the competition, resulting in a better weight-to-capacity ratio. Unlike other brands, DJI have not yet introduced a range extender. In addition to the standard charger, there is also a high-performance charger, which cuts charging time by about half. Before our test rides, we had a chance to use the high-performance charger which took around 1.5 hours to charge the battery from 0 to 75%. The charger is also small and lightweight, making it easy to carry in a hip pack or smaller backpack for recharging on the go.

DJI also produce the displays and remotes in-house. The 2″ OLED display, which is similar to the one of the TQ motor system, can be integrated seamlessly into the top tube. It’s the only display in this test that features a touchscreen. The touch functionality works even better than on modern smartphones and can be operated while wearing gloves too. Muck and water splashes don’t affect its performance either. Additionally, the display is packed with features, including a GPS sensor, barometer, gyroscopic sensors, and numerous connectivity options like ANT+ and Bluetooth 5.1, allowing you to precisely track your rides and store the data on the 8 GB internal memory or the matching app. It also displays various metrics like heart rate and calorie consumption, provided you connect it to compatible devices like a chest strap.

The motor system can be controlled either via the touch display or the handlebar remotes. DJI opted for two small remotes that are positioned discreetly on the left and right sides of the handlebars, blending seamlessly into the overall design with their minimalist construction. On the left, you can switch between riding modes, and activate walk and boost modes, while on the right, you can cycle through the numerous functions and screens on the display, even while riding, without taking your hands off the handlebars. In terms of feel and haptics, the remotes impress with their high-quality build and excellent ergonomics – top notch!

But a great motor system is nothing without a comprehensive and user-friendly app. We know that DJI can create intuitive apps for drone control, but is this also the case with their e-bike drive? Absolutely! Despite its countless features, the app is easy and intuitive to navigate, and even beginners will quickly get the hang of it. You can customise the interface to suit your preferences or adjust the ride modes in various parameters, such as torque, overrun duration, pedal sensitivity, and starting power. Thanks to the integrated GPS sensor, you can locate your bike, and the smartphone acts as the key, disabling motor functions – just like Bosch’s anti-theft function. The advantage? Unlike Bosch, everything is included, and there’s no need to subscribe to access the full range of features. However, when it comes to navigation, Bosch still have the edge: the DJI Avinox app doesn’t offer this function. You can only track activities and upload them to third-party apps like Strava. The software features we mentioned are just the tip of the iceberg; listing all the app’s functions would go beyond the scope of this review.

DJI Avinox on test – the ultimate allrounder?

While riding, you can switch between six assistance levels. In the highest support mode, turbo mode, the motor provides powerful support, effortlessly shuttling you up even the steepest climbs without breaking a sweat. With a strong pedalling effort, you can even maintain speeds close to the 25 km/h limit in steeper sections. In this regard, even the most powerful motors in this test, like the Bosch Performance CX (Gen4 and 5) and Yamaha PW-X3, can’t compete with the DJI Avinox. No matter how hard you push it to its limit, the motor continues to deliver more support without ever hitting a plateau. This is further confirmed by lab tests: while the mechanical output of most other full-power motors levels off between 550 and 600 watts, the DJI Avinox curve continues to rise, reaching up to 750 watts.

DJI manage to unite supposed opposites, offering brute power while ensuring that the Avinox motor is easy to control without feeling abrupt, which is the case with the Brose Drive S Mag and the Yamaha PW-X3. This means that the bike never jolts forward if you accidentally hit the pedals, which is especially useful on technical climbs, allowing you to start off smoothly without the rear wheel slipping. Even on loose surfaces and wet roots, the DJI Avinox motor effectively transfers power to the ground with minimal slippage, pushing you steadily towards the summit. The DJI impresses with its natural riding characteristics and doesn’t overwhelm beginners.

The comprehensive app allows you to quickly adjust the assistance levels to suit your preferences, even mid-ride. For instance, the motor’s overrun can be set from barely noticeable to very long in any riding mode. This extended overrun can help push you over rocks and obstacles on technical climbs where you can’t pedal. When coasting back on a cycle path, the motor support doesn’t cut off abruptly at the 25 km/h limit but gently fades out, almost imperceptibly.

As far as noise levels go, you can hear a faint electric whine when the motor is under full load, which is similar to the noise of the Bosch Performance Line CX and Shimano EP801. However, it’s a noise that doesn’t distract you from riding. If you dial back the assistance levels, the motor is barely audible, and the noise is easily drowned out by the sound of the tires.

Conclusions about the DJI Avinox motor system

It’s not just the specs of the DJI Avinox motor system that impressed us. In practice, the drive system proves to be a superb all-rounder for a wide range of applications, appealing to both beginners and advanced riders alike. When it comes to power and control, the DJI Avinox motor outshines the big dogs in the e-bike drive segment, and in terms of software and connectivity features, DJI play in a different league with their highly intuitive app and countless functions. Well deserved Best in Test award!

Tops

• Massive power and excellent control
• Well-rounded overall concept
• Sensitive and responsive performance
• Intuitive app with countless features

Flops

• Currently available exclusively in AMFLOW bikes

For more information visit dji.com

The test field

For an overview of our big ebike motor comparison test click here

All ebike motors in test: Bosch Performance Line CX Gen 5 (Click for review) | Bosch Performance Line CX (Click for review) | Bosch Performance Line CX Race (Click for review) | Bosch Performance Line SX (Click for review) | Brose Drive S Mag (Click for review) | DJI Avinox | FAZUA Ride 60 (Click for review) | GIANT SyncDrive Pro2 (Click for review) | Panasonic GX Ultimate (Click for review) | Pinion MGU E1.12 (Click for review) | Shimano EP801 (Click for review) | Specialized SL 1.2 (Click for review) | Specialized 2.2 (Click for review) | TQ HPR 50 | Yamaha PW-X3 (Click for review)

Der Beitrag DJI Avinox M1 – in our big e-mountainbike motor group test erschien zuerst auf E-MOUNTAINBIKE Magazine.

This review forms part of our big ebike motor comparison test. Here you’ll find an overview of all 15 motors in review, along with lots of exciting background information, and helpful buying advice for your next purchase!

For years, Bosch have been the industry leader in the e-motor segment, and are still widely appreciated for their extensive service network and years of experience. However, times are changing, and new motor manufacturers enter the market with innovative technology, challenging Bosch’s dominant position.

Not backing down, Bosch respond with the new Performance Line CX Gen 5 flagship model. The previous CX Gen 4 motor was a popular choice amongst bike manufacturers and used profusely for eMTBs, trekking bikes, and E-SUVs. In our big E-MTB comparison test, nearly 44% of the test field relied on a Bosch motor, underlining the brand’s dominance. For serious racers, Bosch offer the Performance Line CX Race drive, which delivers a whopping 400% assistance via a software tweak – unleashing its power even faster than the CX, which offers up to 340% assistance. However, it’s yet unclear whether Bosch will also release a Race version of the Gen 5 Line CX. For riders focusing on a light system weight, Bosch offer the SX motor, which delivers less torque and is also slightly more compact.

Bosch’s success isn’t based solely on motor performance; it’s also about their holistic approach. Their cohesive system of motors, batteries, displays, and remotes is supported by a dense service network. In over 100 countries, authorized dealers ensure riders can access Bosch service worldwide. Notably, Bosch use a closed system, meaning that third-party batteries aren’t compatible.

The Bosch Performance Line CX Gen 5 in detail – The all-around eMTB solution?

Redesigned from the ground up with exciting new features, the Bosch Performance Line CX Gen 5 still delivers 85 Nm of torque, 600-watt peak power, and up to 340% assistance. The most striking upgrades are the fewer mounting points, which have been reduced from three to two, and the more compact housing, which both allow to reduce weight by 100g and give engineers more freedom with frame designs. Weighing in at 2.8 kg, the CX Gen 5 sits in the middle of the test field in terms of weight, right next to the Shimano’s EP801 and Panasonic’s GX Ultimate.

The Bosch Drive Unit draws its power from either a 600Wh or 800Wh battery, both of which are seamlessly integrated into the downtube. Unlike Shimano, which allow bike manufacturers to use third-party batteries, Bosch are strict about their battery options, which are usually determined by the bike manufacturers, with limited choices for consumers. The Bosch 800 Wh PowerTube weighs around 3.9 kg and has the highest energy density in Bosch’s portfolio at 205 Wh/kg, securing a top spot for density. Other systems, like DJI’s drive, have batteries with even higher energy densities. The 600Wh Bosch battery, which is nearly 900g lighter than its 800 Wh counterpart at 3.0 kg, uses 2170 cells that ensure increased power and energy storage. Both PowerTube batteries can be used with DualBattery systems, which allow you to use two batteries or a main battery and the 250-Wh PowerMore Range Extender. The Bosch Range Extender mounts to the downtube and offers a significant advantage: it draws power evenly from both the main battery and the extender, unlike other systems like Shimano’s EP801, which depletes the main battery first before tapping the extender. This even power distribution reduces thermal load and stabilizes temperatures, extending the lifespan of both batteries.

The PowerTube 800 and PowerTube 600 share the same length, making it easier for bike manufacturers to integrate the both in the same bike. The only difference is in thickness, meaning that all it takes to swap between the two batteries is either a special battery cover or a thicker downtube.

Using the standard 4A charger, the big battery can be charged to about 50% in around 2.6 hours. Budget models come with a slower 2A charger, which delivers less power and takes more than twice as long to reach 50% capacity. The faster 4A charger is available for purchase in Bosch’s online shop for € 129.

The Bosch motor system can be paired with different controllers, which the bike manufacturer can choose flexibly based on intended use or their preference, provided they’re compatible with Bosch’s Smart System. The wireless Bosch Mini Remote is a popular choice for sportier eMTBs, allowing riders to adjust support levels with plus and minus buttons, as well as activate functions like walk assist, Hill Hold, and the new Hill-Start function (more on that later). Additionally, the integrated System Controller in the top tube doubles as a power switch and displays the support levels in four increments. These are displayed in different colors that offer good readability even in direct sunlight. Bosch also offer other controllers, such as the LED Remote and the Purion 200, which are slightly bulkier yet consistently high-quality and easy to use.

There are several displays to choose from, including the Kiox 300, Kiox 500, and Intuvia 100. For sporty riders, the newly introduced, compact 1.6″ Purion 400 display provides easy access to ride data like speed, battery level, and distance. Those who want to upgrade their e-bike with a new controller or display can choose from models like the LED Remote, Kiox 300, Kiox 500, or the SmartphoneGrip (a smartphone holder). These can be installed by the user and configured through the eBike Flow app or by an authorized Bosch dealer.

The Kiox models also feature a basic navigation function, which can be loaded with routes via the free eBike Flow app and analyzed post-ride. Additionally, the app offers practical features such as eBike Lock to secure the drive unit and eBike Alarm for theft protection. The latter requires the Connect Module and a Flow+ subscription, which costs approximately € 40 per year or around €5 per month after a free 12-month trial.

One very practical feature is the eBike Flow app, which allows you to customize the support modes, including maximum torque, response dynamics, and various display settings. Compared to other systems from Shimano and Specialized, Bosch offer broad customization options, although these lack the finer adjustments of Specialized’s Mission Control app, which allows power micro-adjustments in 10% increments. Shimano’s E-TUBE app also provides a range of customization options and allows for two different riding profiles. However, Bosch’s eBike Flow app still offers extensive customization options, allowing you to fine-tune the motor’s response to suit your needs and different terrains. Additionally, Bosch’s system is compatible with other products like the new ABS Pro and Bosch eShift automatic drivetrain, although these must be installed in advance by the bike manufacturer and are not available for aftermarket installation.

Bosch Performance Line CX Gen 5 in action

The Bosch Performance Line CX Gen 5 has four support modes, ECO, Tour+, eMTB, and Turbo. The ECO mode saves battery on long rides, while Tour+ and eMTB provide dynamic assistance, automatically adjusting to pedal input. Tour+ offers smoother support from 140% to 270%, which is the ideal match for long fire road climbs and gentle trails, while eMTB delivers 140% to 340% assistance for steep technical climbs.

Thanks to the Extended Boost feature, the motor responds precisely to pedal input in eMTB mode, making it easier to negotiate obstacles like roots and rocks: gentle pedaling activates measured support, while stronger input triggers a powerful yet controllable boost. Turbo mode maximizes power with 340% assistance, albeit at the cost of battery life.

On flat tarmac roads and gravel paths, the Bosch Performance Line CX Gen 5 quickly gets you up to speed before cutting out at the 25 km/h limit. However, the support fades out gently rather than stopping abruptly. While the motor accelerates powerfully at lower speeds, it reaches a performance plateau relatively soon. In contrast, the DJI Avinox ramps up its mechanical power to 750 watts, while the Bosch CX’s power curve flattens out just above 500 watts. This difference is noticeable in the lab and, in practice, results in weaker support at higher speeds.

Bosch’s focus is on a natural ride feeling, which the German motor manufacturer promotes with the “Uphill Flow” slogan. The Bosch Performance Line CX Gen 5 indeed works harmoniously uphill, providing powerful support while at the same time adapting to your riding style very intuitively.
In tricky climbing sections, however, it has a clear limitation compared to the DJI Avinox: while the DJI allows a wider cadence range within a gear, the Performance Line CX requires you to maintain a cadence between 70 and 90 rpm for full support. This can be challenging in steep, technical sections, often requiring gear shifts to get the support you need. Here, the DJI Avinox shows its superiority by providing steady assistance even at suboptimal cadence.

Nevertheless, Bosch introduced useful new features that make a positive impact on the trail. For example, while the GIANT SyncDrive Pro2 motor can engage abruptly in power mode when setting off, Bosch’s new Hill-Start function ensures smooth and controlled starts on steep gradients. The walk-assist feature also makes it easier to push the bike up steep inclines, while the Hill-Hold function prevents the bike from rolling backwards.

The new Bosch CX’s also impresses in terms of noise: even at high cadences, the motor hums discreetly in the background, and is almost completely silent in the weaker modes– similar to the DJI Avinox and Shimano EP801. Bosch also improved the motor’s noise levels when riding downhill: the distinct metallic clunking noise of the Bosch CX Gen 4 – which is also an issue with the current Shimano EP801 drive – is finally gone, significantly improving the overall riding experience. Bosch achieved this by separating the internal and external drivetrains, making the motor significantly quieter even on rough trails. Nice!

Conclusions about the Bosch Performance Line CX Gen 5

The Bosch Performance Line CX Gen 5 is a successful evolution of the CX Gen 4, with targeted improvements addressing previous shortcomings. While the suboptimal gearing causes it tostruggle on steep technical climbs, the Bosch Performance CX remains a powerful and reliable motor that offers excellent support. Thanks to the countless customisation options of the Smart System and Bosch’s industry-leading global service network, the CX Gen 5 is our top recommendation for many eMTB riders.

Tops

• Quiet on descents
• Powerful support
• Sensitive response in eMTB mode
• Dense service network

Flops

• Loses performance at suboptimal cadences on technical climbs

For more information visit bosch-ebike.com

The test field

For an overview of our big ebike motor comparison test click here

All ebike motors in test: Bosch Performance Line CX Gen 5 | Bosch Performance Line CX (Click for review) | Bosch Performance Line CX Race (Click for review) | Bosch Performance Line SX (Click for review) | Brose Drive S Mag (Click for review) | DJI Avinox (Click for review) | FAZUA Ride 60 (Click for review) | GIANT SyncDrive Pro2 (Click for review) | Panasonic GX Ultimate (Click for review) | Pinion MGU E1.12 (Click for review) | Shimano EP801 (Click for review) | Specialized SL 1.2 (Click for review) | Specialized 2.2 (Click for review) | TQ HPR 50 (Click for review) | Yamaha PW-X3 (Click for review)

Der Beitrag Bosch Performance Line CX Gen 5 – In our big e-mountainbike motor group test erschien zuerst auf E-MOUNTAINBIKE Magazine.

No doubt, we love our eMTBs, tech gadgets, and automated helpers that aim to simplify daily life. They’re extremely practical, seemingly freeing us from tedious tasks. But does this practicality genuinely make us happier? Does it truly contribute to our quality of life, or could it even be detrimental?

Consider the fate of Buck, the pampered house dog in Jack London’s novel, who is torn from his comfortable Californian life and forced into the harsh Alaskan wilderness as a sled dog. It’s precisely this drastic change that brings him back to life. Real life. Under extreme conditions, Buck has to relearn survival, and reconnect with his natural instinct. As he adapts to the challenges of his new life, the “call of the wild” grows stronger within him, bringing his life-force back. If you’re intrigued, we recommend reading London’s Call of the Wild.

The latest issue is available now in our free magazine app. If you haven’t installed our app yet, now’s your chance to download it for free in the App Store (iPhone/iPad) or in the Play Store (Android smartphones & tablets).

Technology can simplify life but can also complicate the experience of truly living. Aged 65, Werner (right)– the father of our art director Julian Lemme (left)– realized this too, and swapped his eMTB for a conventional mountain bike. Why? He tells his story best himself in our feature!

Do we really need all of this? The latest tech and the hottest bikes? Or are we at risk of ending up in a seemingly perfect life– totally taken care of by technology and consumption– as in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World?

For those who know us, it’s pretty obvious: we love the latest gadgets, enjoy testing them out, and integrating them into our daily lives. But with caution: the moment it becomes compulsive, and we lose sight of the real-life “forest” because of all the functions, it’s time to disconnect or even switch off. With tech gadgets and new, practical technologies, it’s like AI: the potential is huge– but so are the risks. Those who can use them mindfully, drawing boundaries so they don’t constantly interrupt, distract, or make us lazy, stand to gain a lot. If not, maybe it’s time to rethink your tech/life balance.

It’s definitely tempting to get a gadget for every scenario. But a well-deserved beer, like most heroic stories, often requires one thing above all: challenges. Aren’t mastered efforts, solved problems, thrills, and excitement essential– if not the essence– of life, especially for mountain bikers?

Who doesn’t dream of standing atop a peak at sunrise, sipping a perfectly brewed espresso surrounded by nature? We did it, though the sun didn’t quite come out, and the espresso wasn’t exactly hot. Yet, every second of the ride, the preparation, and the view was worth it. In our sister magazine DOWNTOWN, we aim to find the recipe for the best and most exciting everyday life. And for most of us, coffee is certainly part of that. We’ve prepared a big special feature packed with surprises, technological dreams, and insights that we’re continuously expanding. Just like e-mountainbiking, it’s a blend of indulgence and adventure– whether before or after the ride or as a crowning “summit espresso” at the destination, as you’ll read in this issue!

And now, the highlight of this issue: we’ve expanded our extensive motor comparison test to include the latest e-bike motors on the market, uncovering some surprising, industry-shaping insights. We even developed two mathematical formulas to determine whether you’ll end up with a fantastic eMTB or a lemon! Don’t miss it– this motor comparison test is packed with power and is genuinely exciting. The motor segment is in a disruptive transformation, and 2025 is shaping up to be a showdown among the top players!

The call of the wild is within each of us– we just need to rediscover it. Whether in turbo or eco mode, with the right tech/life balance, you can hear it again. And at some point, you’ll realize your instincts tell you everything– even without health notifications on your smartwatch and other gizmos. Maybe not more efficient or faster, but definitely more alive, pure, and real! So, what are you waiting for? Get out into the wild!

Happy reading and stay inspired,

Der Beitrag The call of the wild – the new E-MOUNTAINBIKE issue #039 is here! erschien zuerst auf E-MOUNTAINBIKE Magazine.

Do you know that feeling? Rather than suffering your way through a sad cup of flat white from your colleague’s cheap coffee maker, you smile politely and say, “Uh, today’s tea day for me” just to avoid regretting every sip later? If you can relate, you’re probably already deep into the coffee game. Whether you’ve been at it for ages or just started, the questions on your journey to the perfect brew at home are always the same: Which method suits me best – espresso machine, Bialetti, or filter coffee? Which beans are right for me – Fairtrade, organic, or from your local roaster? Why does my espresso taste so sour, as if someone poured vinegar into the water tank? And seriously, how do I nail that wonderfully creamy milk froth that baristas whip up in no time at my favourite café?

After countless brewing sessions, espressos, frothing attempts, and a pile of cash spent on a solid setup, some of us are ready to dive even deeper into the wonderful world of caffeine, and the questions get more refined: which high-end workshop can take my La Marzocco espresso machine to the next level, visually speaking? Does a € 3,000 grinder extract even more from my favorite beans from the local boutique roastery? Or is it all bollocks? Well, design is a matter of taste – literally. And dreams don’t always have to remain dreams.

As passionate coffee lovers – and you’re probably too, if you’re still reading – you’ve likely asked yourself one or two of these questions already. Is that right? Then it’s time to get excited: we’ve been on a quest for answers, hunting down the best coffee and the most intriguing products in the world of black gold. And we’ve discovered: not all coffee tastes the same, and latte art is far from the only artistic creation in this magical world. Most importantly, we’re eager to share our growing knowledge with you. Our big DOWNTOWN Coffee Special is packed with strong tips for beginners and enthusiasts alike, helping you get the most out of your coffee. No matter what level you’re at, we’re squeezing out a little more for you and diving in together. Even if your favourite café gets a bit jealous, we’ll give you inspiration for your “daily dose of caffeine,” sharing insights and secrets that are usually well kept behind closed café doors. Ready for your best coffee yet? Our collection of coffee stories, reviews, and tips & tricks is growing alongside our knowledge, so it’s definitely worth checking back in regularly. Let’s go…

You can find the full test at our sister magazine DOWNTOWN.

Der Beitrag Of dreams and fluffy creams – What to expect in DOWNTOWN’s Coffee Special erschien zuerst auf E-MOUNTAINBIKE Magazine.